User talk:Tothebarricades.tk/Archive 2
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Actually, I'm not sure that "poser" is a misspelling of "poseur." In Canada, a "poser" is slang for a particularly difficult question. I'm considering making this change, but I would end up listing the article to be deleted and sent to Wiktionary. Jtmichcock 01:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like it's already been deleted. --Tothebarricades 04:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Anarchy?
Do you consider bands of tribes living together, off the land, anarchy? If so, I'm with you. Some people seem to advocate a reggressive state of anarchy, I take it that's not the idea you have. What say you?
- You might be interested in Green Anarchy, etc), although its proponents do work on pressing issues and are not confined to intellectual masturbation. If you're asking about cases of anarchist organization amongst actually existing tribes, it is a very interesting topic; see the book Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology by David Graeber. --Tothebarricades01:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Yea, that basically sums up that IDEA, that I had. I realize it wouldn't work. You just said the perfect thing.
I think we've evolved so much, that yea, we can't go back, but we better speed the fuck up in our social evolution so we don't kill ourselves and inhibit our survivial with the extent of our technoligical evolution (stem cellls and more efficient killing machines) Cyprus 01:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikiproject anti-war, Article improvement drive
It is an article about a day of much importance both to the history of the anti-war movement and to general discussion of the Iraq war. With a little work from experienced editors it could gain
Style guide
Please see the
Revert by Shaggorama
Hi, I would just like to notify you that your edit to Time Cube was reverted by User:Shaggorama. That is all. — Ambush Commander(Talk) 21:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Good job
Well done highlighting
Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism
Thank you for your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism. I have closed the debate as no consensus. Please note that this does not preclude further discussion of eventual disposition of the article, including keeping, merging, redirection, or a further nomination for deletion. Also, please remember to be civil to those with whom you disagree, even to those who might not be civil to you. Thanks again. -- Jonel | Speak 03:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Interpretation of Dreams
I posted an answer to your Freud question at the reference desk, but since you first left it a number of days ago I figured I should let you know on your talk page. According to a few different edited editions of Freud's book (I played around using Amazon's "search inside this book" feature), the most likely Lenau poem Freud was referencing was "Das tote Glück". --Fastfission 03:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Greetings! You commented on the article
21:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Please check your WP:NA entry
Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:
- If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
- If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
- Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.
Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 02:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Greetings
Greetings, fellow Wikipedian. I wonder if it might be wise to avoid edit summaries such as "read the friggin notice" and "unprofessional reference". It might be good to asusme good faith that your fellow editor has read the notice, and it might be considered uncivil to call a good faith edit an "unprofessional reference". Thank you for your consideration. Johntex\talk 21:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- But I think it's unprofressional. I don't see a problem with speaking my mind. --Tothebarricades 22:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago Democratic National Convention 1968 image 2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 14:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:DeutscherMichel.gif
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:DeutscherMichel.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Summaries
When
- Ha, thanks for the tip. --Tothebarricades 15:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Ethel MacDonald
Ethel MacDonald bare bones are now up. Probably could do with a bit of extra category addittion (or at least a stub entry) cheers N
References
You removed an unreferenced tag on
- This is just elaborating common knowledge; citation would be superfluous. --Tothebarricades 09:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Template:Anti-war topics up for deletion
USHS
Hello. I saw that you recently labled USHS as a copyvio. As the creator of the article, I can gurantee you that it was not. I conducted hours of research, and did not copyright. I even have a link to the homepage. I am removing the template, but I will gladly put it up if you still believe it is a copyvio and have proof. Thetruthbelow 01:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- No apologies needed. Normally I would do the same as you to users, but this time the creator actually created and did no copy :D. Thanks, Thetruthbelow 01:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Long talk page
Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 00:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Everything up to the end of 2005 is now on the archive page linked to the top of this page. If your page content builds up again, simply move a bunch of stuff (aim for about 33k) to User talk:Tothebarricades.tk/Archive 2, and put {{archive}} at the top of the page. Cheers! BD2412 T 03:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Scorpio (Astrology)
I'm afraid I don't have any valid comment to make regarding the content of the article, as I am extremely biased against what I consider to be psuedo scientific mysticism. Other people, some of whom I respect personally for all manner of other reasons, however believe in varying degrees in it. My only concern would be to put a comment in the opening paragraphs indicating that the entire subject is taken as a matter of faith by its adherents, and that there is very little scientific basis* for the claims made.
As there is no way to "disprove" the veracity of any statement that would satisfy an adherent, I feel that your course may be doomed to failure. A believer can point to any combination of "planetary intercections" to "prove" they are right. Best of luck anyway.
- As "birthsigns" are dependent on the month of birth it has been argued that historically people who survive into adulthood may be influenced by the degree of harshness period of the year they were born (on an European basis). It is likely that hardier individuals would have survived the first few months after being born in November/December, whilst less hardy babies would better survive the first months during harvest season. It is more likely that the availability of food in the year, rather than the alignment of planets, was a deciding factor in an pre-industrial society. (I only made my comments specifically in the Scorpio article, since it is my birth sign.)LessHeard vanU 21:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Poseur
Poseur has been created again. Not the same text as last time, but still unsourced. You nominated it for deletion last time, perhaps you could take a look at it again? Thanks, Punkmorten 13:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Editing a Very Naughty Word Beginning with "C"
Saw your edit. I don't oppose it. I never liked the material you removed, but it was in there for a long time. You marked the edit as minor, but IMHO it was reasonably substantive. "No one wants to be fooled into ignoring a significant change to an article simply because it was marked 'minor'. So remember to consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option." Lou Sander 15:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm betting that nobody will put it back in. If they do, I, or somebody else, will ask for a source. I always suspected it might be some sort of cleverly concealed vandalism, but I'm doing a pretty thorough copy edit of the article, and so far I'm guarding against taking stuff out. Regards, Lou Sander 22:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Blanking
I just reverted you here, you accidently blanked a heap of the article. You wouldn't happen to be using Firefox and the Google Toolbar, would you? --james(talk) 11:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Mazandaran Sea Sari City
Hi, I remove that url, So is it possible to add that picture again ? If it's Possible Please add it, Thank You! --
Nobody uses Greenwich Village
The only people who use Greenwich Village are the elderly. I don't see it used in Newspapers, magazines, on television, or by anyone else. People say "West Village" or "The Village". The only time I've heard someone say "Oh, do you live in Greenwich?" or "Take me to Greenwich" is when they are talking about Greenwich Avenue or Greenwich Street. "Remarkably untrue?" No way. I've lived in the East Village for six years, so I would have cause to hear people talk about the West Village, and how it is different from the East, the names, etc. --
- Yes, I like your suggestion. Do you think it was b/c of gentrification that the name fell out, or more so because of the rise in use of East Village, giving the appearance that there *must* be a West Village? Or is it because it's not pleasant to say greenITCH villIDGE - kind of ugly when I think about it. Who knows. --DavidShankBone21:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I like your suggestion. Do you think it was b/c of gentrification that the name fell out, or more so because of the rise in use of East Village, giving the appearance that there *must* be a West Village? Or is it because it's not pleasant to say greenITCH villIDGE - kind of ugly when I think about it. Who knows. --
- I think Bush also uses your hypothesis, hence all those stupid nicknames everyone in Washington *begs* to have. More proof for your theory. --DavidShankBone22:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think Bush also uses your hypothesis, hence all those stupid nicknames everyone in Washington *begs* to have. More proof for your theory. --
Unspecified source for Image:Woman with CNTFAI flag.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Woman with CNTFAI flag.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lupo 13:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- The same applies to Chick Bowen05:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
HeartattaCk
Would you be able to lend a hand on either contributing reliable sources for this article or providing your opinion on the corresponding AfD? PT (s-s-s-s) 00:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Catharsis (band) has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this musician or group might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (music) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 06:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I've had a go at producing a longer article on the life of DA de S. It's mostly an adaptation of the Spanish article on him, plus some stuff from Daily Bleed and a Catalan source. It's still a bit raw - e.g. the list of his writings probably belongs at the end, separate to the body of the article, and I'll have a go at organising it better. Maybe you can see improvements needed? Ottershrew 17:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Somali Diabetics
You placed the current Categories for Discussion page into Category:Somali diabetics. I assume that this was a malformed nomination for deletion? I'll leave it up to you to fix. Robert A.West (Talk) 02:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Matt Pond PA The Nature of Maps album cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Is Pierre Clastres an anarchist?
You have removed the book "Society against state" from the article "list of anarchist books", claiming that the author himself was not an anarchist, while he has been an influence for this political current. Indeed I do not have a quote in which Pierre Clastres proclaims to be an anarchist, but, nevertheless, this book "takes sides". I believe this book is anarchist and that therefore it is suitable for this article. Please read this quote from an excerpt taken from the book:
"When, in primitive society, the economic dynamic lends itself to definition as a distinct and autonomous domain, when the activity of production becomes alienated, accountable labor, 1evied by men who will enjoy the fruits of that labor, what has come to pass is that society has been divided into rulers and ruled, masters and subjects--it has ceased to exorcise the thing that will be its ruin: power and the respect for power. Society's major division, the division that is the basis for all the others, including no doubt the division of labor, is the new vertical ordering of things between a base and a summit; it is the great political cleavage between those who hold the force, be it military or religious, and those subject to that force. The political relation of power precedes and founds the economic relation of exploitation. Alienation is political before it is economic; power precedes labor; the economic derives from the political; the emergence of the State determines the advent of classes."
Not only he gives a scientific contribution to some concepts of primitivist anarchism, such as the view of division of labor as the source for State, but also he calls this process as a form of "alienation". This author considers the anarchist state as the “natural” state, in this book as in others. While the scientific analysis of the primitive societies cannot be in itself viewed as sympathetic, these two approaches are not mutually exclusive, neither. Not all “anarchist books” have to be books of propaganda written in the first person. Please consider revising your position.Maziotis 19:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Individualist (real) anarchism as a major historical school of thought.
Individualist anarchism never gained much traction on the Continent, but was influential here in the States. The writings of Benjamin Tucker or Lysander Spooner (who continues to be a major influence on the Rothbardian nutjob wing of the libertarian movement) are a good place to start. Tucker was especially critical of socialism and utopian communism.
That, at least since Nozick, anarchism has commonly meant the individualist sort and not a decentralized socialism, is also something to consider before you go about the Wikipedia wantonly antagonizing contributors questioning why an anarchist perspective is written without reference to individualist anarchist points of view. Bkalafut 07:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Conflict logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading
Please go to
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
) 17:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Unspecified source for Image:Conflict logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Conflict logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
) 17:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Orphaned non-free image (Image:Conflict logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)