User talk:Truthseeker81

Would you mind adding the full reference (title, ISBN, etc.) for the source that you quoted regarding Vinyak Savarkar's views on Buddhism and untouchability? I'm trying to integrate the chunks of quoted text that are littering the article and make it a bit more encyclopedia-sounding- really want to include a summary of Savarkar's views as a non-Buddhist perspective on Buddhism and caste. --Clay Collier 08:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Buddhism and Hinduism. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Max Talk (+) 00:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 00:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

The anon contributor seems to be trying to bait you into an argument instead of making any actual contributions- I'd encourage you to ignore him. I've warned him on the discussion page and added the NPA warning template to his talk page. If his behavior continues, you should consider asking for an admin to intervene- he's disrupting things without contributing to the discussion. --Clay Collier 20:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to take a look at the Bhagavad Gita article here; they have several sources regarding that dating of the Gita that seem to be at odds with the ones that you are looking at. If you could provide a better source regarding the dating of the Gita (the 'Wacklepedia' link is useless- it looks like an old fork of Wikipedia or something, entirely without sources), that would improve things a bit. --Clay Collier 10:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of forty-eight hours for violating the three-revert rule at Buddhism and Hinduism (again). To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 01:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current