User talk:Unit388

Messages:

== February 2015 == --Unit388 (talk) 03:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unit388! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 16:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello, I'm Unit388. An edit that you recently made to usertalk:Unit388 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Unit388 (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Hello, Unit388. You have new messages at Jim Carter's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jim Carter 04:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted your deletion template again which you unilaterlally created against established policy and procedure. Please note that if you insist on not proposing new policy through normal collaborative procedure, the next discussion will be at

This idea does have merit. If you want to proceed I recommend drafting the template in userspace and proposing it at

Chillum 07:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Also per this post by you I have deleted

Chillum 07:22, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, A frequent new user error is that they forget to sign their posts. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, I installed an auto sign script but it must not be working. Unit388 (talk) 07:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unit388. You have new messages at Unit388's talk page.
Message added 13:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Unit388 (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A good faith proposal but without sufficient research and consideration for the extensive work on such lines that is alreay being done by teams of experienced users. Please see: User talk:Jim Carter#Proposed better NPP system. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TAnthony&diff=prev&oldid=646102461 (Re: This edit) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say exactly the same thing, looks like Kudpung beat me to it. There is no possible way that "Show your support" could be considered a neutral message. I would also suggest you follow his advice in the above section and slow down on making new proposals that do not seem well thought out and where you have not demonstrated a persistent need for what you propose.

talk) 20:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Alright sorry guys wont happen again. Unit388 (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LMGM - Lync’s Molecular Geometry Model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LMGM - Lync’s Molecular Geometry Model until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. smileguy91^{Need to talk?} 02:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lync Aronson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede66 18:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lync Aronson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable election candidate trying to use wikipedia as a campaign platform. No in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lync Aronson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lync Aronson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lync Aronson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive Committee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Unit388. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of