User talk:UnknownUnknown2000

Hello, I want to apologize for apparently breaking the rules. I am extremely new to editing wikipedia and did not even know about the talk page for the article, or about my personal talk page here with the warning on it until I found out I was blocked and googled it. I was attempting to update the article regarding new information using the same exact source as found in citation/footnote #19. I assumed that someone else was maliciously removing my edits repeatedly. Being new, I did not know about the 3RR rule, and repeatedly put my content back. I would request, now that I am aware of the rules to be unbanned, and also an explanation as to why what I felt was a constructive addition to this article using the same accepted source in footnote #19 regarding a living person is allowed to be deleted? Or was the person that was repeatedly deleting my content also banned? Once again my apologies for breaking the rules and for the perhaps naive questions.

I am strongly of the opinion that the present version of the Wikipedia interface, unlike earlier versions, does not make it clear enough to new editors when they have got new messages on their talk page, and so I am willing to believe that you did not realise. An orange notice does appear near the top of the page, but it is rather small and can easily be missed by someone who has no reason to be looking for it. It seems that several other editors think that infowars is not a sufficiently reliable source. As for why they have not removed another reference to that same source, you had better ask them, but my guess is that they did not notice it, and very probably one of them will remove it if you point it out to them. There was no "person that was repeatedly deleting [your] content": rather there were several other editors who each removed it once, or in one case twice, as you can see from the editing history of the article. (Click on the "View history" link at the top of the article.)