User talk:Utfor

User:Utfor is a doppelganger of User:Iceblock created due to forgotten password. Please post to User talk:Utfor instead of User_talk:Iceblock, even if User:Iceblock is mentioned in the diff in question.

Hi, Utfor. I was thinking that the many names for specific splits might better be added to the diagram under splits spare, or some entries left out altogether. The informal names for splits, though not formally 'wrong' under Wikipedia principles but obscure names probably don't reach the threshold of notability, and make the glossary read more and more like a list of trivia rather than a serious glossary about the concepts and principles underlying bowling. I haven't resolved the issue in my own mind, but please give it some thought. Thanks for contributing. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:RCraig09 Thank you for your feedback. I have reverted the glossary for now. What do you think about moving the entries to split (bowling), or do each split need a few sentences of comments? Without comments, will it be trivia even in the split (bowling) page? Utfor (talk) 19:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Utfor: I am copying this discussion to Talk:Glossary of bowling so other concerned editors may weigh in. Let's continue any discussion there. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Warning triangle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Utfor,

Please do not create nonsense redirects like this one. It's a waste of time for other admins to tag and delete pages and, to be honest, it just brings more scrutiny to your edits and your account as editors look for other mistakes you might have made. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I am sorry for not understanding this is unwanted. Utfor (talk) 00:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect First night. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 4#First night until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Utfor,

I don't know anything about editing "Modules" so I'm not going to edit this page and instead would like you to remove

I will do this now. Thank you for the notice! Utfor (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you find an answer to this question? If not,

No, I didn't. I will try at VPT, but not right away. Thank you for the message! Utfor (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason = parameter for

Module:Active hours has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]