User talk:Valrith

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

I don't see how their argument holds any water at all. The IP, according to their edit summary, is claiming that we have no way of knowing that the press releases are coming from Adams directly. But they're at her site! The IP's edit should be reverted, IMO. Dismas|^(talk) 03:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove references from articles, such as you did for Anika Knudsen! If you feel that an inline reference is out of place, you can for example use Template:Failed verification. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 12:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That template does not appear to be appropriate, as it claims it should be used when a cited source contradicts a claim it's supposed to support... What policy are you referring to in making your statement? Valrith (talk) 03:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm at work and thus can't check questionable sources. You're usually on at this time, I think, so I'm just asking you to check on the edits being made to the Ashley Blue article tonight. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 00:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very questionable indeed. Adding 2 full paragraphs on a supposed controversy (which is not a controversy at all) to an article about someone that is not 2 paragraphs long itself just isn't reasonable, even if the issue were important (it's not)... Valrith (talk) 03:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your "needs editing to read less like a promo/psa", I've removed the "Board of Directors" section. Let me know if there are further tweaks you'd like to see. - RoyBoy 02:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your cool.

Greshthegreat (talk) 20:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! '"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple. If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Cheers! "We could read for-EVER; reading round the wiki!" (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greshthegreat (talk • contribs) [reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Valrith. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Cox, Artist. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Cox, Artist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Certes (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]