User talk:Vektorman

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jarkeld (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note at the article's talk page. Unfortunately, the license of the source is incompatible with Wikipedia's. It indicates "Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved." Content placed on Wikipedia must also be licensed for modification. See Terms of Use and Wikipedia:Copyrights for more information about licensing requirements on Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, I'm afraid we can't accept material that is licensed only for verbatim copying. Our license requires permission for modification ('remixing') as well. Material imported to Wikipedia must be free for duplication (commercial and otherwise) and modification. See

Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nagarjuna G., and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://fkft.eu/2008/speakers/31.en.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

Hi. I could restore the article, but it could be deleted again immediately because there is no evidence of Wikipedia:Notability, no references, etc. So I think you need to do some more work to get it up to wikipedia standard first. Deb (talk) 12:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(redacted - see below) MLauba (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vektorman, I'm disappointed that you did not make any significant changes to the article before you re-posted it. I hope you understand the position now. Deb (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nagarjuna G., and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://fkft.eu/2008/speakers/31.en.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

Please note that since changing out licensing terms on Jun 16, 2009, GFDL-only content can no longer be re-used on Wikipedia. See Foundation:Terms of Use for more details. Accordingly, the article was deleted again, and should only be recreated in your own words. Further, for the same reasons, the text repasted above will be blanked. MLauba (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Timotheus Canens (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

our copyright policies before editing further. MLauba (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Juan José Ciarlante

The article Juan José Ciarlante has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I found very little of relevance in GoogleBooks and GoogleScholar - does not appear to pass either

WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 21:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]