User talk:Vincentupsdellred

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Vincentupsdellred, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Your recent edits in history articles

Hello Vincentupsdellred, thank you for your efforts to improve these history articles. However, I have reverted some of these edits: Wikipedia is not considered a

reliable source itself and should not be used as reference. Also, the usage of overly precise dates in sub-articles can be problematic and redundant. It's better (imo) to present and explain these precise dates in the main articles, where additional context can be provided (especially when articles refer to dates over 1,000+ years ago). GermanJoe (talk) 23:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Ways to improve Anna Fortunato Brivio

Hi, I'm PamD. Vincentupsdellred, thanks for creating

Anna Fortunato Brivio
!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Did she do anything to make her notable in her own right, not just as someone else's mother?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

the Teahouse
.

PamD 23:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Fortunato Brivio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Anna Fortunato Brivio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 23:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of
Anna Fortunato Brivio
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Anna Fortunato Brivio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Fortunato Brivio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 06:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Control copyright icon Hello Vincentupsdellred, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Fibonacci have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Joseph Fourier has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


TheFamousPeople.com as a source

Hi Vincentupsdellred . I noticed that you used thefamouspeople.com as a source in

talk) 16:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Ronz
I sincerely apologize for using a substandard source in my editing. I hope I don't do that again.
Vincentupsdellred (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No apology needed. We all make mistakes, and it's a common problem to use what appears to be a helpful reference. --
talk) 01:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vincentupsdellred. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I didn't make it to the elections, but I didn't know about this particular election until today, December 6th, at 4:45 PM. Please forgive me for my absence.

Vincentupsdellred (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC):[reply]