User talk:Vulpes-bengalensis

@KylieTastic Thank You

Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 18:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir this study done by my fellow Indian herpetologist and they give me permission to use and put this article on Wikipedia. I have complete PDF file that give by Indian herpetologist to me. I can provide you proof of chatting with them and also can provide you that PDF file. Give me an option in which I can provide you PDF and Screenshot of chatt for proof Wild Trait (talk) 06:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Creating unnecessary spam changes and requests over Wikipedia pages ) --Hahahapk (talk) 02:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly what you are doing, Rivu- "creating spam changes and requests." Please stop, else your IP and sockpuppet accounts will be banned by administrators. Not to mention these childish actions are only harming your reputation. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 03:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Oligodon&species=russelius&search_param=%28%28taxon%3D%27snake%27%29%29.

closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here

.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Oligodon Russelius may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vulpes-bengalensis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 19:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir this study done by my fellow Indian herpetologist and they give me permission to use and put this article on Wikipedia. I have complete PDF file that give by Indian herpetologist to me. I can provide you proof of chatting with them and also can provide you that PDF file. Give me an option in which I can provide you PDF and Screenshot of chatt for proof Wild Trait (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not really sure what should be the appropriate procedure to put the material in Wikipedia without violating the policies, but I believe uploading the article pdf to Wikimedia Commons with the "Fair Use" licensing can be done. I would suggest you to seek help from an administrator, I will also do the same. I had modified parts of the copy-pasted text taken from reptile-db which was present in the

Draft:Oligodon russelius with speedy-deletion because the article edit-history still has the copyrighted material. I will re-create it after it gets cleaned. Meanwhile I'll see what can be done. Thanks for reaching out. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 06:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@User:Wild Trait I have asked for help here- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#AfD_Article_has_copyrighted_text,_creator_claims_original_authors_have_granted_fair-use_permission.

Can you please comment there? Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 07:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sir I am Expert in Snakes not Wikipedia expert please guide me to create Article Oligodon russelius on the base of new taxonomic study. Sir if we ask some one " What is Venom" every person simple answer me Venom is a toxin that gets into the body by being injected, usually by a bite or a sting. then how can I write this definition in my own words. Wild Trait (talk) 05:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Wild trait It is totally fine to not be a 'Wikipedia expert', just knowing how to edit is enough. Other volunteers are there to take care of the rest. Also I'm glad to meet an expert herpetologist here, your help will be much appreciated. I will be writing the russelius article, you can fill in any info that you wish to include there. Also you may create the article if you want in any other language that you are comfortable in [Hindi or other] in the respective wiki. [Link to hindi wiki here: https://hi.m.wikipedia.org/]

You can ask me if you need any help at any point. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 17:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to

@User:Diannaa This wasn't a copy-and-paste job. Also, the article is a "Work-in-Progress" and most of the text in the article is to be copyedited anyhow. In any case, thank you for not deleting the entire article. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia, not even temporarily for editing, not even in sandboxes or drafts. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs and work on it there until you are sure it's completely original. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please describe what you were trying to do here? Thanks! Ovinus (talk) 07:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see the relevent talk page. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 07:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay! You can follow the instructions at

WP:RFD if you want it deleted. The community will take your input and decide. Of course, if you want to create an article in its place, you are welcome to do so by simply overwriting the redirect with the new content. Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 07:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

>Oh, okay! You can follow the instructions at

WP:RFD

if you want it deleted.

Okay, will do so.

>...simply overwriting the redirect with the new content.

I think it would be better to start the article in draft, and delete the blank article for the time being. Thanks. Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hormonotus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Oligodon russelius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy review! Vulpes-bengalensis (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]