User talk:WikiEditorPublicGood999

]

Las Cruces Academy

]

Las Cruces Academy

]

Las Cruces Academy

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

]

Reply to Modussiccandi

This is not promotional material, this is informational material. If I was allowed to continue with this article it could be improved more. Thanks!

Las Cruces Academy

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

I will fix the issues within the next 24 hours if this page is not deleted. Thanks.

Las Cruces Academy

• No, incorrect. "Personal gain" has nothing to do with it. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 20:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Drmies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Las Cruces Academy

Blanking a page, as you did at Editor of the Week, could be considered vandalism. Especially as it followed your failed attempt to add your name to this years recipients. An awkward editor on WikiPedia is like a bull in a china shop, prone to doing unintentional mischief. Be more careful. ―Buster7 ☎ 05:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Las Cruces Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Cruces Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I have been blocked for editing my own page! This is shameful and will not be repeated. When unblocked in the next few hours, I will show that I am a useful editor. This is totally unnessessary and taking things to the extreme. Shame on you, and shut up ~Yamla. WikiEditorPublicGood999 (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to resume editing once the block expires, but if you repeat the edits that lead to your current block, expect the next block to be substantially longer. --Yamla (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly led to my current block anyways? ~Yamla? I see no reasons why this extreme measure was taken in the first place. Outrageous.

You continued to remove the Article for Deletion template from

Las Cruces Academy against policy, even though it clearly states you must not do this and even though multiple users correctly reverted your inappropriate removal. --Yamla (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Hello, WikiEditorPublicGood999,

You're not getting off to a good start here at Wikipedia. You are fortunate that this is a short block, I have seen editors who were similarly disruptive, removing speedy deletion and AFD tags from pages, get indefinitely blocked. You can't say comments like "This deletion is unacceptable" when everything being done is according to Wikipedia policy. You would benefit from reading more about Wikipedia's policies because you don't seem to be familiar with the grounds for deletion or what "promotional" is. Please educate yourself more so you can get up-to-speed because you are doing disruptive actions that will have consequences. If you continue after your block is over, the next block will be substantially longer.

One resources you might use is taking any questions you have about editing on Wikipedia to

the Teahouse. There are experienced editors there who can explain decisions that seem to frustrate you, they are there to help you navigate through the many policies that govern this project. I encourage you to give it a try. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Las Cruces Academy. Thanks! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]