User talk:WikiTryHardDieHard

]

Proposed deletion of Verdun (video game)

The article Verdun (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Computer game, still in beta (it says). Referencing is to own site, the distributor, and another that doesn't really establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of that. Are you going to clean-up the formatting as well? Now that the content has been removed it leaves list of large/bold font items, each with citations. It's pretty ugly as is. Arbalest Mike (talk) 18:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of medical mnemonics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MONA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've been doing some major work on the

Hello and good afternoon (at least it is afternoon where I am). I was looking at the Wikipedian firefighters category and noticed that you are one of the members of the Wikipedia community that lists yourself as being a firefighter. First and foremost let me say thank you for your service. While I myself am not a firefighter, I do work as a photographer with multiple local fire departments. I am honored to have firefighters as some of my closest friends.

I have been taking an active role in the Fire Service WikiProject and am trying to recruit more members to this cause. If this is something you have any interest in, please let me know? You can leave me a message on my talk page. Obviously there is zero obligation. An interest can be anything from helping out with a couple of pages in your local area to helping to overhaul major templates, and anything in between.

Once again, thank you for your service. Hope to hear from you soon. Stay safe! --Zackmann08 (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Medical cannabis in the United States

added a link pointing to Georgia

Timeline of cannabis legalization in the United States

added a link pointing to Georgia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann08 (talk) 20:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann08 (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We should try to use high quality secondary sources such as review articles, major textbooks and position papers. Thus replaced this pilots study with a textbook.[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't known about the preference for secondary sources. Sorry about that. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 04:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this textbook as it is copied and pasted from Wikipedia [2] (to clarify this textbook has copied from us) There are a few lines of textbooks that are. One wants to use a major medical textbook :-) Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I removed another use of the reference on scoop stretcher. By the way, I just got done watching your talk at UBC. Very informative.--WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit this. I'm not the only editor who prefers the plain English of "a large number of" to "numerous", and, more importantly, "Works on late-era Utagawa artists such as Kunisada and Kuniyoshi have revived some contemporary esteem these artists had enjoyed." is simply broken and requires the "of the". If the sentece ended with "esteem", you'd be right, and the "of the" would be superfluous, but the sentence isn't saying merely "some contemporary esteem", but some of a particular amount of esteem that had been lost. The sentence as you've "fixed" it does not mean the same thing. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 01:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant to "thank" you, not revert the edit. My computer seemes to have glitched and hit the wrong button.-WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 01:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure—it's not the first time something like that's happened. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 02:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Credit score in the United States page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

RfC going that hasn't generated much traffic. Wanted to see if you might have an opinion that you would care to share on the matter. See here. The question is regarding whether or not to include a long list of disbanded fire companies in the article about the Detroit Fire Department. Anyway, if you have any thoughts on the matter, please chime in! If not, please ignore this and have an awesome monday! --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

My apologies for reverting that. A complete mistake on my part. GAB^Hello! 19:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you have edited a number of pages regarding wildfires, I would love you to comment on this discussion about what qualifies as a current wildfire if you have a moment. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of legal loopholes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of legal loopholes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conroe Fire Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 20:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I see you're deleting duplicate wikilinks with AWB. While this is often useful I'd like to ask you to stop doing so as simply deleting any duplicate wikilink to an article is often detrimental, as in this edit to reddit: for instance see alsos should never be unlinked and publishers of references can be linked many times as that can be useful when a user views a reference and would like to know more about its publisher. Additionally (not the case in this particular edit), in many articles having duplicate wikilinks can be useful - such as articles whose readership are often just interested in a specific section or lists. Are you using your own software to do these edits?

--Fixuture (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• No, I'm just using
  MOS:DUPLINK it appears I was in the wrong. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 21:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

You changed the winner of the 1990 Mitchell Bam from Jack Wholey to Jack Wholly. See https://web3.acbl.org/nabcwinnersbyname?name=Jack+Wholey and https://web3.acbl.org/nabcwinners?event=Mitchell+Open+Board-a-Match+Teams for correct spelling of Jack's name. Do you know something we don't know? I'll let you fix it first before correcting it.Nicolas.hammond (talk) 02:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Done --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 02:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Automated tools can be powerful. With power comes great responsibility.Nicolas.hammond (talk) 02:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments appreciated here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Do_we_need_to_do_some_consolidation_of_multiple_overlapping_US_cannabis_articles.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Notmuch. zazpot (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiTryHardDieHard. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WikiTryHardDieHard. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of American firefighters killed in the line of duty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of American firefighters killed in the line of duty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American firefighters killed in the line of duty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RF23 (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello WikiTryHardDieHard! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to

WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of DSploit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DSploit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSploit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Newslinger talk 13:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WikiTryHardDieHard. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Open source ecology

Hello, WikiTryHardDieHard. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Open source ecology

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Concern regarding Draft:Low rider bike

article space

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 19:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:Red Pocket XRM

article space

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 20:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Red Pocket XRM

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created,

welcome page

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello WikiTryHardDieHard! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to

WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Gnu Guix logo, Feb. 2015.svg

The file File:Gnu Guix logo, Feb. 2015.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:GNU Guix logo.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greensboro Fire Department

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Greensboro Fire Department requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Apocheir (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plano Fire-Rescue

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Plano Fire-Rescue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Apocheir (talk) 18:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Plano Fire-Rescue

The article

Plano Fire-Rescue has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability under

WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apocheir (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Quiet Epidemic

Knots

Hi, I noticed you added info about

hitch knots, but didn't cite any sources. I encourage you to include citations. By the way, you also got some classifications wrong, but I fixed them; e.g. a water knot isn't a hitch since it can't be tied to a fixed object. — W.andrea (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]