User talk:Wipkipkedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment on my talk page. While I am always open to guidance, I have been an admin here for several years and am reasonably familiar with basic policies, including the one you indicate. You have had a number of articles deleted as being non-notable, and there has been comment elating to this here on your talk page. May I suggest you re-read

^"talk" 11:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Aaron Hawkins, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Hawkins until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 14:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upgraded the article, added more information, links, project links (in talk), and categories. Should be safe now.

talk) 23:47, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logan Edgar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Edgar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wipkipkedia - looking at the AfD for Logan and what is in the local media about him at this stage he doesn't quite make it. I would suggest you park a copy of the article in your sandpit on your user page for future reference and resubmit it when he gets to be notable. The threshold is high and to clear it he will need either national or international award and/or coverage in major national or international media outside of just Dunedin. Your other AfD'd article on Lee looks likely to survive. I have edited it and another NZ wikipedian has added some data. Hope this helps.

talk) 06:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks! 139.80.123.46 (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Vandervis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Vandervis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §FreeRangeFrog 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wipkipkedia - I see you are getting hammered with deletions. The most recent being

• I echo that. An article consisting simply of "Ryman Healthcare is a New Zealand rest home operator" is pure suicide. Your sandbox is
  significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Thank you. Wipkipkedia (talk) 12:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Hi Wikipkedia - you asked: 1. are you in Wiki Project New Zealand?. Yes along with a couple of others 2.In terms of your message, does "no article is better than a blank/bad one" usually happen? Yes, because there are rules under which we collectively operate - take a read of
  talk) 19:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, Wipkipkedia. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Christopher Bishop (politician), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Christopher Bishop (politician) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christopher Bishop (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:POLITICIAN

as he is only a candidate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Bishop (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Bishop (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mattlore (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 21:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I just re-launched the

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject . There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:52, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]