User talk:WmLawson
DYK nomination
Hi. I've nominated key relevance, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on October 22, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks --Bruce1eetalk 07:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Key relevance
BorgQueen (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! --Bruce1eetalk 14:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Jokkmokk Old Church moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Concern regarding Draft:Jokkmokk Old Church
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:Jokkmokk Old Church
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, WmLawson. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Registered Agents Inc.
Hey, I noticed you had taken an interest some weeks ago on the Dan Keen article deletion discussion (involving company ownership of Epik registrar) and I wondered if you would weigh in on my comment on the related Registered Agents article's notability (see: Talk:Registered Agents Inc.) I also think that the user who created the page has shown some degree of bias or COI in their edits, as they seem to have expanded allegations of shady behavior on the part of the company in what they wrote in the article. I think if the article remains it should be entirely neutral, and it seems skewed currently. CapnPhantasm (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)