User talk:WmLawson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

DYK nomination

Hi. I've nominated key relevance, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on October 22, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks --Bruce1eetalk 07:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Key relevance

Updated DYK query On
30 October, [], Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Key relevance, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page
.

BorgQueen (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! --Bruce1eetalk 14:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jokkmokk Old Church moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 22:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, WmLawson. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jokkmokk Old Church
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Registered Agents Inc.

Hey, I noticed you had taken an interest some weeks ago on the Dan Keen article deletion discussion (involving company ownership of Epik registrar) and I wondered if you would weigh in on my comment on the related Registered Agents article's notability (see: Talk:Registered Agents Inc.) I also think that the user who created the page has shown some degree of bias or COI in their edits, as they seem to have expanded allegations of shady behavior on the part of the company in what they wrote in the article. I think if the article remains it should be entirely neutral, and it seems skewed currently. CapnPhantasm (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at it, but I don't guarantee anything until I've considered merits. WmLawson (talk) 20:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]