User talk:Xxhopingtearsxx

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 15:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 23:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

Hi, I'm a bit unsure about posting here, as your edit summary seemed to indicate you don't want that, but I thought it best to explain anyway. You are completely right, I think, that the article to which I redirected this was not the correct one. I have redirected it to another, which I think is more appropriate. Hope you agree. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 12:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xxhopingtearsxx,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

If you want to practice, you should go to the sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfPolySci45 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited John King (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Wallace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, Xxhopingtearsxx, for recently making your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for improving and updating the coverage of music and U.S. politics in the encyclopedia, and for all your contributions. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tim Pawlenty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xxhopingtearsxx, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Al-Quds TV, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Al-Quds (TV network). Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on

The article

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Thanks for catching all my grammatical errors. I've basically been scouring news sources for the last 8 hour writing the shootings sections. I'm off to bed. Hopefully you can do something with the section and I haven't left it a complete mess. Mkdw^talk 11:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kabul University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Welcome yourself! Looking at your talk page gives a good first impression of who you are. --213.196.218.39 (talk) 12:22, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• That's right! You can tell I'm a guy who's been editing for Wikipedia since 2006. I've made mistakes and I still make mistakes. Nobody's perfect. You didn't seem to hostile to someone else when they said you were soapboxing.--Xxhopingtearsxx (talk) 12:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Btw, I've undone your bad-faith, selective SPA-tagging. Not because it evidently happened in bad faith, but because you managed to bungle the job on top of that. If you cannot even properly follow template instructions, don't use templates. If you have been here since 2006 and cannot use templates, maybe it's time to get another hobby. --213.196.218.39 (talk) 12:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Please stop it with the SPA-tagging. You are intentionally creating more heat than light. Cut it out. --213.196.218.39 (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Please stop it now. The account Beeman86991 (talk · contribs) was created specifically for participation in that discussion. That is obviously not the same as someone just posting a comment from IP. --213.196.218.39 (talk) 12:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)SPA tagging is not helpful on Sandy Hook -- there are sufficient experienced editors monitoring the article, and SPA is generally only helpful for things like Afds to alert closing admins of the nature of an account. We all know there are lots of new editors trying to help us at Sandy Hook; rather than being unfriendly with tags lets try to convert them into long term editors. NE Ent 12:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

• For the record: The User:Beeman86991 account was created at 11:31, 17 December 2012 (see
  not give a fuck and undone my tagging of the account. That bloody SPA template should imho be deleted, I have actually never seen more light than heat coming off of its use and I don't think I'll ever use it again. --213.196.218.39 (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

OK. I came to note politely I thought you were a bit arch in your criticism of one small aspect of my substantial, time-pressured work on Eric J. Boswell. (I never do a string of edits on one article.) OK. I'll take the crit now ... as appropriate advice. And thank my lucky stars ... that's all you found. By the way. The article's even better now. Cheers. :-) 07:25 ps The new pic is a great improvement. (Do we watch this?) Swliv (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm out on a bit of a limb with you, now. Look ok? Fourth (talk) 08:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Only that last one. There's no cite for "acting" yet. (And there is this, too, at some point, besmirched infobox and all :-).) Cheers. Good solstice. Fourth (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I know that recent obits say that Fontella Bass co-wrote the song - but I'm not convinced. Neither the original record label nor BMI credit her as co-writer, and references to her settlement in the 1990s do not say that it was related to her songwriting claim. What evidence do you have prior to the recent obituaries - many of which obviously come from a common source - that she was the co-writer - a claim that is clearly disputed? (here and here). It may well be that the claim that she was the co-writer was made by the press on the basis of them reading our article after this unreferenced edit in 2009. I've added a quote from this book to give more background. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Xxhopingtearsxx, thanks for creating Step Vaessen!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,

Anastasia Bykova (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

A file that you uploaded or altered,

The article

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Hello, Xxhopingtearsxx. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gooooooooogle. Since you had some involvement with the Gooooooooogle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stufftoreview 003.jpg

The file File:Stufftoreview 003.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear robot This has been corrected Thanks Me

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]