User talk:Yarkoski1012

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

Please do not removes speedy deletion templates, you may add the template "hangon" if you disagree. There are instructions on the template itself.-Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Rick Roeber, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Roeber. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tijuana Brass (talk) 00:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Make sure to include what you posted on my talk page to the AfD discussion. Since I opened the AfD, I'm not the one who will close it (since it'd be a conflict of interest); consequently, it'll be more helpful if you make mention of this where others will see it. Adding a comment on the changes you've made there will help the closing admin to see what's been done. Tijuana Brass (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, regarding your comment on the AfD, don't feel that you need to stay behind the scenes, as it were. If you find something like this, stepping up with it can often mean the difference between keeping an article and deleting it - and the goal should always be to keep something, if we can. Good work. Tijuana Brass (talk) 23:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

I've changed to "keep" at AfD. Well done for the effort put in. Looks good with the picture too :-) Cheers. Sting_au Talk 10:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. You really did a good job bringing the article up to par; were it not for you, it may have been deleted. Even though I started the AfD, my own preference is to keep an article whenever possible - which is what you helped to happen here. Great work. Tijuana Brass (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rick Roeber, you may be blocked from editing. What you did is akin to vandalism. It is pure nonsense to change an article based on predicting the future, and to think that you can literally rewrite history itself in the process. — Smuckola(talk) 17:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rick Roeber. You probably need to stop editing this article. — Smuckola(talk) 01:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know what a source is, which a search engine is not. Nobody is searching for your alleged source, which doesn't exist there anyway, because we need a secondary article as a

WP:COI, if you are associated with this subject in any way, you must declare it now. — Smuckola(talk) 02:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]