User talk:Yarnalgo
|
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6
Thank you Yarnalgo!
I created the page "List of rovers on extraterrestrial bodies". It is the first article i have ever created in Wikipedia. I reviewed the page on 19th January, 2020 and saw your edits. I am glad to see that your edit has improved the article quite a bit.
So thank you for your contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanvir Ahmed Zubair (talk • contribs) 15:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you too!!!
Thanks for your prompt and trouble-free gentrification of my correction of the small technical error in the Arrokoth article - looks spiffy!! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.197.221.141 (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- No problem! --Yarnalgo talk 17:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bridgeport Barrage.jpg

Thank you for uploading
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ]
Cancel it
No need Abdullah Al Manjur (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Don’t talk at the discussion sorry ok Abdullah Al Manjur (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Starlink
What do you think of Paul Benedict's latest edit? Cordially. CRS-20 (talk) 00:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @CRS-20: Seems fine to me. Do you think it doesn't belong in the intro? --Yarnalgo talk 17:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it should be in 2018-2019, in my opinion. CRS-20 (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Roscosmos vs. RKA
Hi, thanks for your edits on Roscosmos and RKA. The fact is that RKA is one of the precursors to Roscosmos (it existed from 1992 to 1999). Roscosmos (full name: Federal Space Agency) was established in 2004. They explain it here, in the first paragraph: https://www.roscosmos.ru/9156/ Also, Roscosmos is an acronym, and RKA is an abbreviation, not the other way around. Best regards.
]- @]
- Also, I just noticed that the Crisis years section talks about what "Roscosmos" was doing in the 1990s, and the next section talks about "Roscosmos" cosmonauts flying to the ISS in 2000, which contradicts what you just told me about Roscosmos being established in 2004 (not saying you're wrong, just that the article is confusing as it's written). Can you make this more clear in the article? I would make these changes myself, but clearly you are more knowledgeable on this topic, and I could use your help. Thanks! --Yarnalgo talk 19:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, the Roscosmos article should definitely be rewritten, including the second paragraph where they mention one of the precursors to Roscosmos: first, the year given, 1992, is blatantly wrong (correct year: 2004), and secondly, Roscosmos had several precursors. Will try to fix it when I have time. As to acronyms: RKA is pronounced letter by letter (at least in Russian: "er-kah-ah"), so it's NOT an acronym, while Roscosmos is pronounced as a word, which means it's an acronym. "Roscosmos" is formed of the first three letters of the word "Rossiysky" (Russian) and the word "kosmos" (space). It literally means "Russian space". P.S. As a matter of fact, the current Roscosmos was established in 2015; the previos organization, also called Roscosmos, existed from 2004 to 2015 (yes, this stuff is quite confusing). All this info must be mentioned in the article. ]
- Added info on the precursors. ]
- @Buxareu: Looks great, thank you! And I think I see what you mean now. I've always thought an abbreviation like RKA was called an acronym under the first definition given on Wiktionary ("An abbreviation formed by the initial letters of other words"), but I guess based on the second half of the definition there that it is more of an initialism ("A term formed from the initial letters of several words or parts of words, but which is itself pronounced letter by letter"). And Roscosmos fits under the second given definition of acronym: "An abbreviation formed by the beginning letters or syllables of other words". Abbreviation seems to be the umbrella term that encompasses all of these ("A shortened or contracted form of a word or phrase"). Thanks again for explaining! --Yarnalgo talk 19:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)]
- Also, I just noticed that the Crisis years section talks about what "Roscosmos" was doing in the 1990s, and the next section talks about "Roscosmos" cosmonauts flying to the ISS in 2000, which contradicts what you just told me about Roscosmos being established in 2004 (not saying you're wrong, just that the article is confusing as it's written). Can you make this more clear in the article? I would make these changes myself, but clearly you are more knowledgeable on this topic, and I could use your help. Thanks! --Yarnalgo talk 19:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
New Horizons
Hi. Sorry, can't find a printed source, but asked members of the team and been told it's unlikely a third target will be found. There's not even a Hubble search going on, is there? Maybe we could say that. — kwami (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @published source. I've talked to members of the team too, and their analysis said there was a ~1% chance of finding a new target. That information has never been released publicly though so we can't put it in the article. They are using Subaru for the initial search this time around and then will use Hubble for follow-up observations to confirm any candidates. They are currently analyzing the data collected from Subaru over the last couple months and should know within the next few weeks whether there's any viable candidates or not so maybe some more information will be released publicly soon. --Yarnalgo talk 21:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)]
That's why I didn't revert you. I thought you might be able to find sources, which it looks like you will be, so I'll leave it in your hands. — kwami (talk) 21:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, unfortunately they just haven't released much publicly yet about the search besides the article that is already cited there. As soon as they do, I'll be sure to update the page. --Yarnalgo talk 22:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Orphaned non-free image File:Aerojet Rocketdyne logo.png

Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
Orphaned non-free image File:Canadian Lacrosse Association logo.png

Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
]Van zyl overlook
I request you to Please come forward and make a page for van zyl overlook. it is a important site in Mars 2020 mission and needed for new Mars 2020 self portrait image. Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, don't have the time for that. --Yarnalgo talk 17:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 01.jpg

Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
]Orphaned non-free image File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 02.jpg

Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
]Orphaned non-free image File:Blast Lacrosse Screen 03.jpg

Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
]Is this robotic arm a permanent iss robotic Arm or just for a short time on ISS
Hi Yarnalgo sir, can you please help me in this matter. i wrote about GITAI S1 Robotic Arm Tech Demo as a tech demo on this wikipedia page SpaceX CRS-23. Though it is a tech demo, if it will remain aboard ISS, then this mission will be a ISS assembly mission like the CRS 21 and CRS 22.If it is not permanent iss arm, then i will be relieved. but if yes then i have to do lot of changes on these pages on wikipedia. Thus it will be needed to create a new topic for this arm and then it must be added to ISS assembly page and then we have to write about it on all robotic arm page about iss like canadarm2, era, dextre, strela, Mobile Servicing System, etc. this thing seems to me a bit confusing. so please share your views sir. Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- I am not familiar with this tech demo, and I don't have time to do the research myself. If you are not clear on its purpose then I'd advise you not to make any changes yourself until and unless you find reliable sources that make it clear. Otherwise, just let the other editors that know more do their work. You don't need to do anything, especially if you don't understand what something is for yourself. --Yarnalgo talk 18:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starlink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
]Concern regarding Draft:In The Crease
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
]Your draft article, Draft:In The Crease

Hello, Yarnalgo. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
{{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Quebec Caribous for deletion

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebec Caribous until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Boleyn (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Yarnalgo! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to
Nomination of List of career achievements by Gary Gait for deletion

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Gary Gait until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KinetX logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:KinetX logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
Orphaned non-free image File:Tyvak logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tyvak logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
Orphaned non-free image File:Delaware lacrosse.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Delaware lacrosse.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
Orphaned non-free image File:International Astronautical Federation logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:International Astronautical Federation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in
Greetings!
I have noticed that you made a Userbox, which I will leave below. I was wondering if there was a version for females such as me. It is very well made, and I intend to use it for my user page. It would be appreciated that if there is not a version for females that one is made. I'm not forcing you to do this, however. I am just suggesting that you do. Thank you so much, and keep creating!
AstronomyKid1 (talk) 15:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Here is the Userbox, by the way.
UBX | This user hopes you read each and every one of his userboxes! or else... |