User talk:Ye9CYNMD

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linkin Park. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand the confusion, but I was following the instrumentation listing for the band members. Brad Delson played bass while recording Hybrid Theory due to the absence of Phoenix, while Chester is listed as playing occasional rhythm guitar from 2006 until his death in 2017. I used the "occasional rhythm guitar" color from Alice in Chain's timeline. Sorry if there was any confusion, but I don't believe my edits were disruptive. Ye9CYNMD (talk) 15:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Like a Stone, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Call Me (Shinedown song)

Hello Ye9CYNMD,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

Call Me (Shinedown song)

for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ortizesp (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of FurAffinity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Discussion is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FurAffinity (2nd nomination). You are welcome to continue improving the article or chime in at the discussion. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FurAffinity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FurAffinity, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FurAffinity (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ye9CYNMD! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk · contribs] 06:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

thanks ^^ Ye9CYNMD (talk) 02:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Blank Space

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Blank Space, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 03:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

ITN recognition for John Barnett (whistleblower)

On 17 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Barnett (whistleblower), which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]