User talk:Yerpo/Archive 1

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for making that more encyclopaedic... a part of you dying seems a bit harsh though! As the player of the game, it would be "you" performing those actions, after all.

(And man, do you have that article on watch or something? That must have been about a 30 second response time :) 77.102.101.220 (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I saw your edit by chance when I clicked on the list of recent changes. As for the "you" part, I'm sorry if it sounded harsh, but encyclopedic articles aren't just indended for players of the game (I, for one, never played it). It sounds like reading the game's manual which encyclopedia is not. — Yerpo ^Eh? 13:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. As for the thing with the external links, I didn't realise that was policy. My apologies. Would it be alright to either add the images to the wiki repository, or have the links as reference-type footnotes, ie there's superscript numbers (or that box with an arrow in... you can tell i'm not expert here can't you...) next to their names leading down to the links at the bottom? As it is the Mobygames link doesn't offer the same info without much digging, and they're useful to show how closely the designs mimic that of the original real-world cars. It's a silly bit of trivia maybe, but of interest to someone like myself who grew up playing it and could swear that they looked like 'something' vaguely familiar, but not 'what', and maybe without the time to go hunting through the net for the shots. There are internal links to said realworld cars after all.

(BTW you could've put something to that effect in the "edit reason" box when deleting them and I would have picked up on it earlier instead of going round in a big loop of add-delete-add-delete because for all I know it was someone either griefing or mistakenly thinking I was...! :) 77.102.101.220 (talk) 06:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

We try to avoid excessive use of copyrighted material, because Wikipedia aims to collect knowledge that is freely reusable. Only images that are crucial for understanding the subject (the game as a whole in this case) are included - more about this is explained

listed here - and let me know if you get stuck. The only remaining issue is, that there is no reference as to which real-world cars they look similar to, which is an original research problem. Maybe there is some publication in which game creators explain what did they use as basis for their designs (such as the game manual)? — Yerpo ^Eh?

07:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Yerpo, I would just like to ask why you labled this disaster [1] as not sifficiently important...this definately made world headlines. 29 people were killed, and this coming from me who lives in another country. This has international significance, there are natural disasters that are included in the years articles that even have less of a death toll... It should definately be included.--

This has been discussed before - see Talk:2010/Archive 3#Pike River Mine inclusion, and the consensus was that it doesn't belong among the world's most important events in 2010. Please note that international notability doesn't automatically mean international importance. For that, it would have to affect more than just NZ. — Yerpo ^Eh? 14:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh my!... Sorry for the trouble. I was just very curious. Keep up with the good work I guess :) --

(talk to me)

15:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

The shooting on Jan. 8 should be recognized in the 2011 article. I have reasons! --Solowing106 (talk) 01:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Discussion moved to Talk:Icy Tower#Linking in the Icy Tower's infobox — Yerpo ^Eh? 11:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

To si rekel na wikipediji, da to ni pomembno kaj pišejo drugi, ker na wikipediji ti pišeš zgodovino, torej ti ponarediš stvari in zgodovine. Če gledaš na Cobissu http://cobiss4.izum.si/scripts/cobiss?id=2138195125814027 imam diplomsko delo iz prekmurske teme, torej moja beseda je prava, tvoja pa ni. Koliko si se ukvarjal s to temo? Samo tiste propagande vire gledaš, ki jih so napisali Kranjec, Šebjanič, Godina, Čačinovič in drugi? To misliš, da radi imajo Prekmurci Ljubljančare?

Briga me kaj ti misliš, diploma gor ali dol. Me tudi nič ne briga kaj mislijo Prekmurci o Ljubljančanih. Važni so samo vsi ugledni viri, pa če se strinjaš z njimi ali ne. In dokler tega ne boš razumel, se še vedno nimava kaj pogovarjat. Zdaj pa prosim nehaj smetit še po moji pogovorni strani, ker je eno mesto za to debato dovolj. — Yerpo ^Eh? 19:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Naj bo tvoja briga, ker mi ne študiramo iz tistih neuglednih virov, torej če ne uporabim teh virov, zakaj je potrebno tukaj uporabiti? Naj bo tvoja briga, da sem napisal diplomsko nalogo, ker so jo sprejeli, torej moja diplomska naloga je verodostojen vir. In zakaj je potrebno stari navadni kristavec? Tebi treba razumeti, da kaj delaš ti, to protivno proti načelu wikipedije, ker wikipedija maksimalno dovoli, da napr. iz arhiva uporabimo vire. Prosim te, ne komentiraj tistega pogovara, ker tvoja kraljevina je slovenska wikipedija.

Komentiral bom kar hočem in kar čutim da moram, ker dosti bolje razumem Wikipedijo kot ti. Wikipedija ni Univerza v Sombotelu. Arhivski viri so primarni viri, torej čitaj

WP:PRIMARY: Material based purely on primary sources should be avoided. Torej mi ne govori o načelih Wikipedije, ker nimaš pojma o njih. — Yerpo ^Eh?

20:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Slabo veš, ker wikipedija verodostojne vire prosi, sicer moji viri so bili brezhibni, samo ti pa drugi so rekli, da niso. Namreč zdaj so bila nova predavanja v Soboti, pa v Sombotelu, ki so okrepili to. V Mariboru in v Sombotelu so tudi rekli, da vi: ti, Andrejj, pa drugi norosti pišete, ker zmotne in ponarejene informacije ste pisali o slovenskem jeziku (kot o slovenskem glasoslovju). In odtakrat tudi niste popravili teh norosti! Ti nimaš pojma, blatite tudi vaš jezik! Odpravite se program na slovenski wikipediji, da bi te norosti popravili in brisali o slovenščini, pa tudi o slovenskih regijah, mestih, itn. Ker Hrvati boljšo enciklopedijo. Tam pišem v hrvaški temi in zanimovo da Hrvati to ni razpravljajo, ampak nisem Hrvat, samo nekaj let se ukvarjam s hrvaškimi stvarmi.

talk

20:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Nočem te žaliti, samo svetujem, da išči Toporišičevo slovnico, ker je ne vidim med viri in seveda več člankov piše o slovenskem jeziku, tam iščite napake. Meni niso rekli, kaj so napake, pa jih ne bom iskal.

Če želiš, jaz bom tudi pisal nekaj "pljuvanj" o Vas, kaki ljudje ste Vi na slovenski wikipediji. Bom pokazal mojemu predavatelju tudi, naj popravi besedilo. Ne ne le enega članka, temveč več: kak se obnašate, da norosti pišete o Sloveniji in o sosednjih državah. Ne vem koliko člankov madžarskih naselij ima slabe podatke (kot

Verjamem da bo tvoj misteriozni predavatelj, ki ga tako rad omenjaš, za razliko od tebe razumel kako se tukaj dela, samo ti že par let govoriš kako ga boš poklical, pa ni nič od tega. Oprosti, ampak takšne osnovnošolske finte smo že prerasli nekateri. Pokliči ga že končno, samo nehaj smetit po moji pogovorni strani. — Yerpo ^Eh? 07:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Zakaj bi bil misteriozni moj predavatelj? Ne moreš pogledati strani sombotelske univerze? In to zakaj bi bilo smetanje? Pogovorna stran je za pogovor, torej midva sva tukaj pogovarjava, a ne? toliko.

Ker verjetno nimaš samo enega in ker ti počasi ne verjamem več da on res to pravi tako kot ti to predstavljaš. Smetenje je pa zato, ker s svojim blatenjem ne prispevaš nič h izboljšanju Wikipedije. Zato nehaj, zadnjič prosim. — Yerpo ^Eh? 07:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Boš se presenetil Yerpo, samo enega pravega imam, pa dva druga sta me učila tudi. V Sombotelu ne študira sto učencev na slovenistiki, samo trije. Ne vem odkod si vzel, da je to blatenje, dokler tvoje delo ni bilo drugačno.

Hi Yerpo, some kind of weird markup error has appeared in the notes you added at Slovene dialects (displaying stuff like ^{?UNIQ485008cb1b47f5a9-nowiki-0000008F-QINU?25?UNIQ485008cb1b47f5a9-nowiki-00000090-QINU?}). Some kind of link rot, maybe? Or maybe just my display? I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks, Doremo (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Looks like a program error in displaying references. The links themselves work, it just displays garbled text instead of [xx]. I've been noticing changes in display of other features (such as categories) recently, it's probably related and will get fixed eventually. You can report the bug on Bugzilla (details here) if it doesn't go away after a while. — Yerpo ^Eh? 13:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks; I'll watch and wait. Doremo (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for finding the real reason why the film was excluded! I thought it had to be something else apart from it being a silent film. Thanks again. Lugnuts (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Plarem has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Happy Halloween! – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 15:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Yerpo,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

Čestitam. --

my talk

09:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Hvala :) — Yerpo ^Eh? 10:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

– Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 13:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for pointing out the Wiki policy on the Olympian article! JoelWhy (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Yerpo, you are invited!

You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region.

AHK barnstar

	AHK barnstar
	Thanks for your changes in emijrp (talk ) 14:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome :) I'll try to come up with more stuff to add. — Yerpo ^Eh? 16:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

• Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
• If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at
  WP:Credo accounts/Citations
  .
• Credo would love to hear feedback at
  WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
• Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
• If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name
  here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay Yerpo. I don't want to sound rude, but please let me explain the difference between awards and award's. You implied that "In the awards history" should be corrected to "In the award's history". In this instance (awards) is perfectly correct as a noun. The award's mine = a shortened version of "The award is mine". The awards = is the plural version of the noun.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/awards#English

e.g Aisling Bea has won several awards. Her award's well deserved. I understand you thought you were right, so you re-edited the entry to reflect your stubbornness and mis-education. Please research before you decide to impose your misspellings upon others. There was absolutely no need to correct it to award's which isn't literally correct in this instance. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm011g6433 (talk • contribs) 11:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you at least read my explanation and try to understand what is being said in the article? That sentence doesn't refer to multiple awards received by Aisling Bea, but the Gilded Balloon 'You are funny' award (in this case refering to it as an institution). Aisling Bea is the second person in its - the award's - history that got it twice. The article English possessive clearly states: "Nouns, noun phrases and some pronouns generally form a possessive with the suffix -'s". You seem to disagree (and if you realy didn't intend to sound rude, I must inform you that you failed miserably) so you should probably let the editors of the English possessive article know about your intellectual superiority. While you're at it, you can go teach the Guardian's Brian Logan about his stubbornness and mis-education. Just please stop wasting my time, and, if I may suggest, remove that ironic text about your manners from your user page. It's distasteful. Thank you. — Yerpo ^Eh? 11:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you even read properly what I'm telling you. eg Signifies EXAMPLE. This was why it preceded my mock-up example text to stress and highlight differences between the two examples (I suppose I should add an apostrophe and make it example's?). It also implies to me your English language skills are not exemplary enough to call yourself fluent. This was me highlighting the difference between Award's (a multitude of individual awards) and Awards (a collective way to refer to them). You have read the use of word "award's" and decided this is the only way to use that term. There can be no other, and as a revelation to the English language -we must all accept your decision. Should anybody disagree, you will impose your erroneous use of the English Language upon people (which you demonstrated by your arrogance and failure to discuss before you edited). The word became Award's because it was plural in the newspaper article (which means more than one!).

As an entity, the Award Ceremony is ONLY refered to as "awards" which I PREVIOUSLY pointed out via the Wiktionary link. This refers to the entity, not the number. And if you had bothered to pay attention to the very article you quoted, you would have noticed the demonstrated use of Awards in the second last paragraph:

"Nica Burns, the West End theatre producer and organiser of the Edinburgh comedy awards" [2]

To summarise, it would only be Award's if it was descriptively more than one. "The awards history" is talking about the history of THE AWARD, and as a single entity.

Thank you for your valuable time and arrogance! pfffff

Goodbye indeed! --Tm011g6433 (talk) 02:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Wow, you sure can muddy the issue when you set your mind to proving you're "right". First by claiming that "award's" can only be a shortened version for "award is" (which is false), then equating the ceremony with the award as an institution (which is also false). Your l33t grammar skillz for plural are impressive, but I'm afraid that you have a slight problem with what's called functional literacy. Maybe some more examples will help? It would also help to realize that your Wiktionary example doesn't refer to any ceremony at all, but maybe I'm hoping for too much... — Yerpo ^Eh? 07:16, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email [email protected] your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check
  applications page
  to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

• If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at [email protected]
• If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at [email protected]

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Yerpo,

24 hours have not passed and I am still bussy adding sources. The subject is no of the premier divers in the world and lessor divers have been inlcuded onto wikipedia. I agree that article can be written better and will comply with the request. I urge you to if you do a quick internet research to at least hit the following site http://www.eurotek.uk.com/johanboshoff.htm. He is one of the presenters of the international technical dive expo and one only gets invited if see as your peer as being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoseidonDiver (talk • contribs) 09:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

This discussion belongs to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan Boshoff, where I replied to your message. — Yerpo ^Eh? 10:00, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I left a message at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Louis_Adamic#Not_his_picture Please let me know what is better to do, considering I am not a regular contributor and my time is really limited. Hvala!--Andrew Nino (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I've removed Taghishsimon's name from the request as it appears unlikely they will do anything with it, and it's more likely to get a copy editor without one being listed. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 20:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

And now I've carried out the copy edit. Please would you note that I've added a {{

which?}} tag in the main Biography section, as "the organism" isn't meaningful unless a specific organism has been identified. (In this case, is it the effect of electroshocks on the human body?) Regards, --Stfg (talk

) 18:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate this. I specified the electroshock part and although "chemism of M. tuberculosis and electroshocks" sounds strange, this is what the source says (I misread it originally). Feel free to check it yourself if you get any better ideas, the Royal Society content is free this month. — Yerpo ^Eh? 21:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

It's OK, I have JSTOR access. But as I read it, FN1 isn't saying chemism of ... electroshocks. There's a significant comma there. I'm trying an edit to align with the way I read it, but please don't hesitate to revert it if your reading is different. --Stfg (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Yerpo! How are you? I'm a beginner contributor of Wikipedia and i'm trying to write an spanish article about University of Maribor. I tried to use the logo that you uploaded but unfortunately I couldn't. Do you know why? Is any copyright protection? I thought all the media uploaded was available for any language. Thanks in advance, hope you can help me, Sole.--SoleFabrizio (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not sure what happened, but do you mean sl:File:LogotipUM.gif? Yes, all logos are copyrigted in Slovenia, so the file is uploaded locally at slwiki under "fair use" doctrine. Commons doesn't accept "fair use" files, so it cannot be uploaded there (only Commons-uploaded files are available in any language). I think Spanish Wikipedia has a policy of not allowing local uploads, so it looks like the article will have to be without the logo. But don't worry, the main building is more recognizable than the logo anyway, so it will be enough to illustrate the subject. — Yerpo ^Eh? 08:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Yerpo! I just realized you reverted some accidental vandalism I committed on the Movie camera page - much obliged. I had only meant to correct a few minor stylistic things, but apparently I fat-fingered the commit. Best regards, --Nettings (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)