User talk:You've gone incognito/Archive 3

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Per

Side 1

1. "Song Title"
2. "Song Title"
3. " Another song"

Side 2

1. "Side B Song
2. "Last Song"

Just mention which song is on each side. Good luck with the Carrie article! Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi again. Just letting you know I'd be happy to review

@

sphere

14:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good, just ping me when you're ready and start 21 grams when you're ready too. :)

talk

) 14:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Also just want to be honest, the hardest part of writing this article was choosing what to call it. '21 grams experiment' just seemed like the best title, considering the popular culture references (the experiment doesn't have an official name). Feel free to suggest the article name be moved in your review, if you think that is appropriate.

talk

) 15:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

@

Hi there. No worries about it taking a while. And I was quite pleased with the amount of DYK hits for 21 grams too :). I've just completely my initial review and have placed you nomination on hold. While I've got your attention, I tried to ping you (and several other people) back to the

talk

) 12:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello:

I have just begun a copy edit of this article posted on the GOCE request page. I notice that throughout the article the director's name appears as Winding Rfen. I thought this was a bit unusual so I checked and discovered that Variety refers to him simply as Refn and this is how he is named in his WP biography. I changed the name in the lead but then thought I had better check with you. Do you have some reference that shows he refers to himslef as Winding Rfen, or should his name be shortened throughout the rest of the article? Look forward to hearing your thought.Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

In the Directors' Guild article cited in the "Early Life" section, the writer refers to him simply as Refn - so that's two good sources to support shortening the name. I notice in his WP bio his name starts out as Refn but soon becomes inconsistent throughout the rest of the article. Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Drive has been completed.

I have a suggestion concerning the Top Ten Lists section.

I would delete this list, which is overkill, and instead replace it with this paragraph:

It was picked as the best film of the year by:

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

talk

) 08:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Slightlymad I believe the article does observe WP's guidelines on logical quotation. As to the list, it's your call. If you created it, then I think you'd be within your rights to edit it; if not, I guess you can try for a consensus. I'm pretty sure any FAR would say it's unnecessary. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Slightlymad I would remove the heading Top Ten Lists and insert the paragraph at the end of the Critical Response section.Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I know you never actually agreed to do anything, but is there any chance you could throw a FAC review my way? I'm getting worried that it's not gonna pass—not because it isn't good enough, but because it's down at the bottom of the nominations page with one support too few. If you have the time, I'd be grateful if you could review it. And even though I already reviewed your article, I'd make sure I'd remember to review your next FAC. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

@Homeostasis07: I believe this is why you performed a source review of my FAR. Very well, I'll see what I can do and make sure to do it soon before the FAC coordinators lay their thoughts on it. I feel terrible that this article has had trouble getting promoted to FA, it's a pity.

Update

Thanks a lot. I'll keep an eye out for your username at the FAC page for a few more weeks. After that, feel free to leave a message at my talk page, because I'd be happy to throw another source review your way (They seem to be the kind of reviews holding up most nominations–I don't know why, they're actually easier than regular reviews). Thanks again. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnWickTwo -- JohnWickTwo (talk

u Hello Slight. Just saw your message on my talk page about the GA nomination for the article on 11B-X-1371. The article is very interesting for me as a filmmaker and it seems to be good enough to warrant a GA nomination. I will be glad to review it, however that might take some time as I am currently working on expanding my own article for FA status. I will point out that you should probably think about using other External Links besides other Wikis and the video's youtube page (wiki's aren't exactly the best external links). Also Make sure that you can use all possible information made available on the video that are from reliable sources, I've learned this through my own expansion of articles. I will get to reviewing the article as soon as I can, it's looking pretty good so far with the only (minor) issue being the external links. Take care.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

@

talk

) 02:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Thought you were the nominator... Interesting. Thanks. I'm always looking for collaborators so if you're interested in working with me on expanding the article I'm working feel free to let me know.--Paleface Jack (talk) 14:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

The article 13 Assassins (2010 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:13 Assassins (2010 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnWickTwo -- JohnWickTwo (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

The article

The article

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Godville

Slightlymad, do you intend to return to your review of this DYK soon, or should I put out a call for a new reviewer. The nominator pinged you back in mid-July. Please let me know your plans. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taken 3 OST.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK Buy Bust

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --GRuban (talk

) 02:41, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 13 Assassins (2010 film)

The article 13 Assassins (2010 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:13 Assassins (2010 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Kita Kita

This is the English language Wikipedia. All non-English article title must be translated to English (literal translation if it doesn't have an offcial English title/name) for the benefit of readers. I don't see any reason why the incorrect Japanese characters must be included in the article since 1) it is incorrect, 2) this is the English Wikipedia, and 3) the film is not a Japanese production. The Japanese characters in the poster is obviously used as a decoration to signify the setting of the film (Japan). Hollyckuhno (talk) 00:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@

^mad

03:42, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Buy Bust

On

Buy Bust? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Buy Bust. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Buy Bust), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Removal of Dilim images?

I noticed you removed the title and actor images from the article on the film Dilim. Can you say why? Any objection to having them restored? --GRuban (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Well the way they were placed in the article were eyesore; they overwhelm the article as you scroll.

^mad

14:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

OK, let me try a few things, and I'll write when it's ready for you to take a look at again. --GRuban (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Btw, I didn't remove the title; after adding an infobox, I simply moved the lede below it.

^mad

16:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

@

^mad

05:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

That would have been a lot of work; and wouldn't be responsive (the last few images are pretty poor quality, someday someone will lighten them and make them higher resolution, and we'd have to remake the tall image). But take a look at the gallery, I think that doesn't overwhelm the article. --GRuban (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

There, it looks cleaner! That'll do,

^mad

14:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Undoing My Pope Francis Edit

Ten days ago you undid an edit I made a while back to the Pope Francis page, saying that I was cherrypicking information. The reason I didn't remove the Kate D'Annunzio from that article was because it added context to better understand the original statement and its intent. It didn't judge whether the Pope's statement was good or right, it just explained how it was meant to be taken.

The other quote didn't offer any new information besides "some people liked the decision." I think including every significant compliment or condemnation of Francis's teaching would make his page unreadable, so I though it best to stop editors from going down that path. If I'm wrong or ignorant of some of Wikipedia's policy on this, please let me know.--Qswizzle (talk) 00:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Well Go USA logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting 'We Are X' FA nomination

Hi there,

I just wanted to say a personal thank you for supporting my FA nomination for We Are X. If you happen to know anyone who would be able to also help with this nomination, please let me know.

Cheers,

ISD (talk) 11:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

^mad

11:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the advice. Cheers, ISD (talk) 15:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Help with Nightcrawler

Hi again,

Recently I've had my edits reverted by TheOldJacobite on Nightcrawler, specifically the inclusion of a cast section, and to a lesser extent sourcing the budget and gross income of the film in the infobox. You brought up a good point that we aren't an indiscriminate provider of information, and that actors important enough to the film should be included. I just wanted to check if you still agreed with that, and whether I'm in the wrong or not. Also, just so that I'm not crazy, the budget and gross income are already sourced in the article, there is no need to source them in the infobox. The only reason the run time is sourced is because I didn't think it needed to be mentioned in the body of the article. Famous Hobo (talk) 15:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chiara Badano in 1987.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.