User talk:Zaferalpat

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  User:Zaferalpat/sandbox
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  User:Zaferalpat/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zaferalpat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hey why my account deleted? Zaferalpat (talk) 13:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zaferalpat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, zaferalpat, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

thank you for writing me i dont get it i have many internationel movies and Tv shows and commercials i have so many actors have their wikipedia please make it my online too:) Zaferalpat (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zafer Alpat. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what should i do to approve? i m ready Zaferalpat (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find multiple reliable, independent sources that cover you in significant detail and depth. Theroadislong (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kelebek/keyif/zafer-alpat-kimdir-hollywood-belgeseline-damga-vurdu-40073201

i have many of them:)) Zaferalpat (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See

your first article, creating an article on Wikipedia is the hardest task there is here, creating one about yourself is 10 times harder, in all my years editing here I can't recall a single successful autobiography being accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

so what i m gonna do start being process over again i dont understad what exactly m i gonna do:) sorry bothering you :) Zaferalpat (talk) 15:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If your life and achievements are verifiable and genuinely

WP:YOURSELF. Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

so you are telling me just wait until someone do for me ? trust me i m waiting long time :) any other recommendation ? Zaferalpat (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Theroadislong, but my recommendation would simply be to forget about Wikipedia, as far as an article about yourself is concerned. I think you misunderstand what Wikipedia is meant to do. It is not a way to make a person (or company, or thing, or anything else) famous, or to let the world know about them. Wikipedia's purpose is to summarise what

yeah you are right but producers are concern about wikipedia thats why really want be on wikipedia and also i relly dont understad even some background actors are in wikipedia hows that work that criteria i really dont understand but i really appreciate your effort Zaferalpat (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be VERY surprised if a background actor was on Wikipedia can you point any out?

I can’t give the name I don’t want destroy someone else’s carrier:) Zaferalpat (talk) 16:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Zaferalpat. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb cannot be used as a source because it is user edited so unreliable.

WP:IMDB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  User:Zaferalpat/sandbox
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

User:Zaferalpat/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

can you give me some tips what can i give the source? Zaferalpat (talk) 12:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need newspaper or magazine articles/reviews that discuss you in-depth with significant detail. See

WP:GNG for notability criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

i upload the newspaper or magazine articles Zaferalpat (talk) 19:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello any updates? Zaferalpat (talk) 10:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not continue to resubmit - clearly

WP:SELFPROMOTION

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zafer Alpat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]