User talk:Zanysatsuma/Archive 1

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DJBullfish, I posted some info on DraftBloomberg.com. It must have sounded promotional. Please let me know what I should adjust so it's fair to post. Maybe it was too many adjectives? :) I'm totally willing to cooperate, just need some guidance. Just created an account if that helps for communicating--username Fosterdt. Thanks!

Dave —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fosterdt (talk • contribs) 02:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found a version that makes sense. Dlohcierekim 01:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Thanks.

talk) 08:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, the Russian political jokes page has an amazingly anti communist point of view, is filled with biases, and everytime i try to edit them out i keep having them reversed. If you class it as vandalism could you at least make an attempt to get an admin or allow myself who is a dedicated communist for serveral years and have visited cuba to try to make a point of view change to neutrel which ofc should be checked by admins. Everytime i make an edit it is took back by someone who has 0 regard for communist ideals except simple one liner ideas and in the spirit of wikipedia i would enjoy some help to make the article neutrel as i can perfectly accept that there well be jokes about the soviet state i just dont want an article which would make mc'carthy blush.

cheers, good enough for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by F4i (talk • contribs) 20:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You said I changed the webpage for Kiani. I didn't. So why did you send me a message? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertjessetelford (talk • contribs) 00:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please turn on your brain and think before you randomly accuse people of vandalism.

The paragraph 'controversies' in the Martina Hingis article clearly is only about statements that she herself has made. The sentence in the begin reads: "(...)number of statemtents (...) such as:" Obviously, the last entry about the doping offence does not fit this category, neither in form nor in content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.182.214 (talk) 12:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You attached a tag to this article today. Any suggestions about what needs to be cleaned up would be welcome. JMcC (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping an eye on Inflation! --Rinconsoleao (talk) 11:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again... I noticed you reverted the obsolete/nonstandard definition of inflation for the standard contemporary definition. Would you mind watching deflation too, where the same battle of usages keeps recurring? Thanks in advance! --Rinconsoleao (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, a bit more caution? You also wiped out a couple of things other editors did to that article in your revert. Pairadox (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I thought I'd checked the diff's for any changes which should be integrated in, but unfortunately I appear to have missed them. Sorry.

talk) 07:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I added a question about your reversion to the article's Talk page. I would appreciate if you could provide a fuller explanation for your edit. Robert.Allen (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you weren't so totally wrong after all. I just noticed that 420 is already listed, but near the beginning of the list before "A" in the second section. I think I missed it because the "TLA" section precedes it, so it becomes a bit buried in the list. Also I did not realize that numbers should be alphabetized before "A" rather than after "Z". Maybe it would be an improvement to add some sort of separator between the TLA list and the main list of terms. Robert.Allen (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much more readable and understandable. Thanks for your contribution! JTRH (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up: it was indeed nonsense. User claims person died (past tense) in the year 2012. ;) Redfarmer (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little surprised by your revertion of BetacommandBot's tag on Image:PosterVelvet 01.jpg without fixing the simple problem of the missing article name in the FUR. I went ahead and fixed the problem. Just wanted to mention it here as it is an easy fix if you are reverting the tag anyway in case you run into more in the future. I hate the way BetacommandBot works, but it seems that the powers that be like it so I guess that we will have to live with it. Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bah. Here I was about to give a pithy comment about how you might want to check out the article, and you beat me to the punch whilst I'm typing. Well-played, well-played.... --jonny-mt 06:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop tagging already tagged images for speedy deletion - I know you're only trying to help, but those images are already listed at

No problem! When an image is tagged, it goes into those areas of

CAT:SD which are demarcated by pink bars. That section is, alas, pretty much permanently backlogged. east.718 at 22:47, January 24, 2008

Haha! You actually did the right thing here, it's just that I'm one of the very few editors who prefer to keep all comments. What you did should be encouraged (although it's a bit pointless since I'll see the message anyway :-D). east.718 at 06:10, January 25, 2008

Dude, please stop tagging already tagged images for speedy deletion. All of the big red {{di... }} tags are speedy tags - what you're doing by tagging them again is doubling the workload and moving the images out of the image section of CSD into the main section. If it's already tagged, some admin will get to it sometime. east.718 at 20:48, January 25, 2008

No i didn't either! But i thought that if this user wished to place an article on wikipedia in a foreign language they should use that languages version of wikipedia to create the article not the English.Thedewster(talk)16:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ye i thought so. n thanks for checkin its always handy to know what uve put up for deletion! lol .Thedewster(talk)16:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well that will save me alot of trouble thanks 4 ur help m8. =] Dewster (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what happened, Twinkle sort of exploded on me. RogueNinja_talk 02:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a new member, so excuse me for that article... now I edited it.. It is about the MU Online character class "Blade Knight".

Magic Gladiator (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you removed the {{

Sorry for the delay in responding, but thanks for your reply. No worries - I was initially confused about which tag I used, so that makes two of us. --Mosmof (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice box.

- CobaltBlueTony™ _talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

- CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 22:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you tagged this as not notable. It should have been tagged as not English as this is the English language wikipedia. Happy patrolling! 08:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The second half of A2 says "That exists on another Wikimedia project". Considering the article itself (I'm actually somewhat convinced it's very poor quality spam, but I can't cook up a good enough translation to be sure); I highly doubt this is on another Wikimedia project. Hence why I didn't tag it with A2. I tagged it with A1 because it didn't provide enough context to properly identify the matter, because it doesn't appear on another Wikimedia project, and again, because I'm only somewhat sure it's spam.

DJBullfish 08:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey, thanks for the tip! REGULAR-NORMAL (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wheel of Fortune (The wheel's configuration) and Wheel of Fortune (List of puzzle categories) have both been nominated as AfD, as of yesterday. Since you've contributed to them, I wanted to give you a heads-up and ask you to join the discussion. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar! I'm babysitting the article right now, as the anon user alternates between re-inserting the deleted cruft and just plain vandalism (inserting 100 line breaks, etc.) I'll take Paul Lynde to BLOCK. JTRH (talk) 02:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response! JTRH (talk) 02:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were right. He's gone for now. JTRH (talk) 02:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I saw that you tagged

Net result's the same—the article got deleted—but for future reference, the db-repost tag can't be used if the article was previously speedy deleted or deleted through the

]

San Jose Task Force Invite

You have been invited to join the WikiProject Ice Hockey. We are dedicated to improving the San Jose Sharks-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in San Jose Sharks and/or your many edits to San Jose Sharks articles. If you would like to join, please visit the task force page , and add your name to the list of active project members. Thank you. LegoKontribsTalkM 04:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this task force is still unofficial, and I would like to have at least five members before asking for approval from

WP:HOCKEY

.

Gravitini

The plural of gravitino is gravitini, as you may look up for yourself. Check gravitini. AnonyScientist (talk) 06:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. --Music26/11 17:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bullfish, i put a few points up on the LLYSF page re the speedy delete, i don't feel terribly strongly either way, but i think that there is a chance that we could work with the article - what do you think? (p.s. - could you reply on the LLYSF talkpage, cheers) Darigan (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping that one out. I added a shit ton of sources because of the nature of UFO's in debate. It would be the type of article without a shit ton of sources I'd think about deleting. I tried keeping things as short as possible as I'm sure some UFO nut will come along to add and improve. Anyways thanks again for helping pare it down to size.

• Requester: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seth_Beer&diff=324306323&oldid=324306244
• Notifier: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Broha8&diff=324306330&oldid=323233002

Heh heh. -

Hello DJBullfish, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (

• Wikipedia:Assume good faith
• Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers

- Kirbman101 (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

This is a response to your comment on the page I created earlier about PHP jobs market in UK. This page is not spam but a reflection of the aforementioned job market. Please kindly remove the spam tag.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.209.113 (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

End result was deletion in accordance with WP spam policies.

DJBullfish 22:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello DJBullfish, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of

Disagree wholeheartedly. The article serves only to promote the modeling career of the person involved, all eight external links promote either the person or the modeling involved...the user name of the creator is "fashion top models", another red flag. It's a promotional piece for the subject in every conceivable way.

DJBullfish 20:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello DJBullfish, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of

It's my opinion that the over-obsessiveness on precise adherence to guidelines creates a climate of lunacy here. Especially when those guidelines are interpreted differently amongst administrators. Thousands of software titles have gotten the heave-ho under the A7 umbrella over the years, whether interpreted as a company or web content or under the purview of both.

DJBullfish 04:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

see here Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 05:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Djbullfish, I understand what is your role, but the CISU article refers to an italian no profit organization, added to add more information in the article List of UFO organizations, the organization CISU [1] is exactly like the British UFO Research Association web site [2] and like all the other organizations indicated in such article. So I really don't understand your action. Obviously the article need to be completed but I was thinking to do it from today. So now if you want you can do it. Thanks.--Abyssadventurer (talk) 07:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sahandra, which you tagged as a hoax in November 2009, for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahandra. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there DJBullfish. I see you previously deleated an article named "Tiffany grainger - Clarkson". I would like to inform you that the same user has now created an

]

Nomination of

Plinko

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plinko (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --

]

New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the

engagement strategy

, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current