Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aadat

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Aliya Bukhari#Dramas. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aadat

)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark. This time, though, I'm adding the observation that I'm already tired of my own copy/paste and wish we'd noticed this the day these nominations were made to consider speedy close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doczilla, But what's wrong with nomination reason being the same? And I'm aware of the backlog, so I've stopped from making nominations for quite some time.Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Copying and pasting the nominating rationale over and over gives the impression that the nominator is not studying each article on its own merit well before putting it on the chopping block. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doczilla, I understand your concerns, but that's not the case. I'm fully aware of the potential negative consequences of intentionally making such disruptive nominations. My nominations are legit.Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per [1] i am doubting
    WP:Before is done or not. Why a series broadcasted in 2017 need nomination discussion now as many Pakistani websites remove old coverage from their websites and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be removed from wikipidea. Libraa2019 (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Libraa2019, This is a WP:ATA. Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found. And if you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions?Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.