Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Brinkman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nasty woman#"Nasty Woman" Apparel. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Brinkman

Amanda Brinkman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially controversial, but this should be redirected to

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article has some problems. However, assuming that this is the same Amanda Brinkman, I think it's a keep. She is widely quoted in the press as a business consultant, and there is also coverage of her new TV show "Small Business Revolution".
  talk) 23:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The WIRED article is an interview presented by Salesforce, meaning that it is of doubtful significance (likely reliable, but I don't think it's a good indication of significance. All it tells us is that she works at a small company and hosts a non-notable tv show). The other article is local coverage, again not really indicative of significance. Also how did you determine that this is the same Brinkman? Our article doesn't mention 'deluxe' or 'Small Business Revolution' once. Also, where do you see this 'wide quoting' in the press? I saw little indication of that and even if that was true, how does it meet our notability standards? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict above): Coverage of 'Small Business Revolution' is essentially limited to local publications except for a short fox news article. And regardless, this would go to establishing the shows notability before it made her notable. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. A google search proves it is is the same person. I can appreciate that you are trying to discount the sources, but to me it is plain that she is widely mentioned in the press. Other examples include this California paper, this Buffalo TV station and this Fox 12 Oregon segment.

talk) 00:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm afraid that A google search proves it is is the same person. just doesn't convince me whatsoever. In fact, a google search proves to me that they are definitely not the same person. See, for instance, this linkedin profile, that of the subject of this article. In what I can see, there is a section that says "other people named Amanda Brinkman", which holds the profile of the other Amanda you have been talking about. Apologies if I've absolutely messed up here, but you seem to have conflated two different people. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 00:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• Redirect to
  WP:ONEEVENT. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.