Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capsugel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capsugel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:AUD. Other sources have rotten away except [3] which is a classic example of a rewritten press release and trivial coverage of routine operations per cited NORG policy. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've revised the article some and introduced content from two published books, one of them a textbook where Capsugel is used as a case study for students. I also gutted the unsourced Facilities section and added only that information supported by one of the books I found to use as a source. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.