Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coastal Grandmother

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 2020s in fashion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coastal Grandmother

Coastal Grandmother (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tiktok trend unworthy of an article. IF this content is worth keeping, I suggest moving to be a section within a more relevant page, like 2020s in fashion or something of that nature. If this becomes a larger known thing and continues beyond a fad of summer 2022, then articledom can be re-discussed, but at this point, it's only worth a section within an article, if that. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's
  list of content for rescue consideration. Thriley (talk) 23:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep notable fashion trend. Andre🚐 03:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into 2020s in fashion, notable enough to be added to that article but I don't think it's currently notable enough for a separate article. Suonii180 (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is a stub article, but based upon the sourcing, there is more than enough to demonstrate that there is enough material to make a standalone article. This article looks like the Indie sleaze article before it was recently expanded. Thriley (talk) 21:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Coverage suggests that

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect or merge to 2020s fashion as described. Oaktree b (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]