Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credihealth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Credihealth

Credihealth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business. Significant RS coverage to meet

• Delete.
  WP:CORPSPAM, start-up spam, business as usual, sources are not much better than press releases. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails notability. Blackguard 20:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete, One of the Important healthcare player in India which is connecting hospitals in Importat cities of Country. Size of company as well as amount of covergae it make in India among patients make it Notable. Vaibhav Kumar (talk) 03:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC) blocked, suspected sock of Ramanuj Bhatnagar (Special:Contributions/Ramanuj_Bhatnagar) Jytdog (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oldest? It was founded in 2013! Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete, Credihealth, Practo, Lybrate, Netmeds and 1mg are the only top players in Indian healthtech space. Wiki's acknowledgement of these healthtech players is definitely important. Ramanuj Bhatnagar (talk) 04:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That comment alone fails
    WP:NPOV. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Don't Delete, Credihealth is the oldest healthcare company which growing day by day. Deepak.kumar8744 (talk) 04:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC) blocked, suspected sock of Ramanuj Bhatnagar (Special:Contributions/Ramanuj_Bhatnagar) Jytdog (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oldest? It was founded in 2013! Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete, Credihealth is top notch healthcare company . 42.111.122.235 (talk) 04:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC) — 42.111.122.235 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • WP:ILIKEIT is not a legitimate reason to support keep/delete in AfD's. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• delete and salt. I cleaned this up, removing content based on press releases or churnalism and have been debating which way to go, as notability is marginal. In light of the obvious votestacking and promotional pressure above, this should be deleted. It is unlikely that the community will be able to maintain a neutral article in light of this kind of campaigning and it is likely that these folks will just keep trying to abuse WP. So - delete and salt. Wikipedia cannot be a vehicle for promotion. Jytdog (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Absolutely no evidence of notability. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Not Delete Large audience and visibility in Country nake it notable. Although article can be expanded. 103.3.205.141 (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC) — 103.3.205.141 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Speedy Delete and Salt Misused by creator/ owner of the company. Blatant promotional and no significance. Light2021 (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I declined an A11 speedy. It is not meant for COI situations like this, but to someone's hypothesis or imaginary creation or invention. DGG ( talk ) 23:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.