Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darian Shirazi (3rd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Radius (software company). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Darian Shirazi

Darian Shirazi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines for multiple reasons. The article contains three claims. One is about relation to better-known people, and we know that notability is not inherited (

WP:TRIVIAL) because it is coverage of the company he founded rather than biographical coverage (and the company has its own page already, Radius_(software_company)). Dariusk (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to a paragraph in the Radius (software company) article and redirect this article there because apart from the notability issue there is minimal content for a stand-alone article, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: shameless COI/SPA activity - only one edit ever made by the article creator, nearly 8,000 bytes - despite two previous noms with 100% D votes. After this is resolved, we need to look at the similar issues of notability, PR, SPA & COI for the associated companies Radius (software company) and Fwix. Rayman60 (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 21:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.