Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Krae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bearcat is harshly admonished for colluding in secret plots without inviting the rest of us. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Krae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Update: despite having not otherwise edited Wikipedia since 2008, the subject/creator of the article sent me a private e-mail within an hour of my initiating this discussion, both trying to contradict my assessment of this article and alleging that I and Wikipedia are colluding with the Canadian film industry in a plot to slander him. Yeah, no, not what's happening here. Bearcat (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - He simply doesn't appear to be notable. As stated above, we don't have the coverage by reliable sources that we need for a proper page. Deletion seems to be the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:SIGCOV. We ted to delete producers' articles, who are after all run of the mill. There's no reliable sources except for the Hollywood Reporter piece, which devotes a single sentence to him. Bearian (talk) 01:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete does not meet
  WP:BIO. Ericfood (talk) 07:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Not enough third-party RS coverage to justify a BLP. Fails
  WP:GNG. (Also, why was this relisted prior to the 7-day mark and with a seemingly apparent consensus?) --Kinu ^t/_c 08:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• weak keep I think it does meet
  WP:BIO. He is producer or executive producer of films which feature bonafied stars. It is not just one notable film he played a major role in producing and writing, there are multiple - A number of which have wikipedia articles of their own. Where there's a problem is in the amount of indepth coverage about him specifically. But don't producers of B movies generally receive less coverage after the films debut ? He started off strong but hasn't done much in a while. That doesn't take away from his earlier successes.Grmike (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)grmike[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.