Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Cooke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 18:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Cooke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a Superintendent ranked RCMP officer, of which there are quite a few in every region. The article consists of a list of every time his name was mentioned in the news while he was doing his job. I see nothing notable about him except for Ref 2 where he was mentioned in relation to Tara Teng, a brush with greatness that conferred BLP worthy status on him. Legacypac (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was wondering what on Earth possessed him to create this. Then I read the final sentence of this nom. I cannot believe this guy (nor the fact he got off without a block). His obsession with Teng sets off very loud alarm bells in my head. This police officer just isn't notable by any reasonable standard. AusLondonder (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It appears that Mr Cooke has had a successful career as a police officer, but I don't think that WP:N is met as the references appear to be about cases and incidents he was involved in rather than about him per-se. Nick-D (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There coverage in all the sources is passing mentions only, not enough for
WP:ANYBIO either. Sarah-Jane (talk) 11:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.