Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gian Carlo Petraccaro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gian Carlo Petraccaro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and deceptively sourced article on a non

many

sources but looking at them I see junk. A look at some.

Three sources to say he got $300 to attend a conference? Hardly the stuff that belongs in an encyclopedia. And the sources, His name appears on a list in the first. No mention in the other two.

Two sources that tell us that a bank collapsed. No mention of him. They do not verify the claim about him.

A link to a home page to say he was a board member. No mention of him.

This all comes down to being the writer and director of Offside, a film of questionable notability (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Offside (2009 film)). Even that section is bombarded with the same source repeated multiple time, each time with a fake title. Without that film there is no notability. Even with it it currently falls short of NFILMMAKER as that film lacks "significant critical attention". duffbeerforme (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with the nominated reasoning; and for similar reasons discussed in
WP:NOTE. Cabrils (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete No notability independent of the film which has itself already been judged non-notable. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.