Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Favour
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Good Favour
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Good Favour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
ping me) 01:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 01:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 01:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep per WP:BEFORE in seconds, I was able to find multiple reviews of the film: Moveable Fest, The Times, RTE, Screendaily, The Irish Times, Variety. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep per above. 30 seconds and two pages in on DuckDuckGo yielded all (most?) of the sources above. That in itself is enough, but I would be thoroughly unsurprised if there are more. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 06:59, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- KEEP - While not very notable, per the links above it has multiple reviews from both its festival premiere (TIFF 2017) as well as its Irish market release (Nov 2018). I'm not sure about the Movable Fest review (blog post) but Variety is RS, Screen Daily maybe RS, RTE and Irish Times seem RS. RTE has both a review and an interview so they're treating it seriously. The above reviews are not 'capsules' even if they're not extensive (e.g. half the length of a typical Ebert review). In addition to being screened at the Irish Film Institute when released there, it obviously was at TIFF as well. I guess TIFF is a big deal for small movies such as this.
- That all said, it's a weak keep for me because it is a small movie, was a 'world cinema' entry at TIFF (who don't offer their own review of it) and I don't think there will be much to write about it (an Irish Examiner interview with the director suggests that it was a co-production with some other countries so maybe that's a thread to unravel a bit). I would be mildly surprised if it ever meets any of the 'enduring' WP:NFILM guidelines but I haven't seen it so that's not meaningful. ogenstein (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep and Improve If you think the film deserves its own page fine, then there should be one worthy of it. Add plot, development, filming, reception, etc. MaskedSinger (talk) 16:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Rotten Tomatoes here shows eleven critics reviews such as Variety, RTE, Sunday Times, Irish Independent, Screen Daily so passes WP:GNG. Nominator please check Rotten Tomatoes before nominating film articles, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:53, 15 June 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.