Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Kutz

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 08:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Kutz

Heidi Kutz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails

WP:BIO. there is no inherent notability in ambassadors, ambassadors have been deleted in WP. Those voting keep should make a genuine attempt to find sources to establish notability, if they don't it will indicate a lack of notability. I could find a few one line mentions confirming she is an ambassador, but nothing to satisfy in depth coverage. LibStar (talk) 07:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 10:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (inform) @ 21:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Essentially everything I can find about her is that she is an ambassador. As a rule we have found that insufficient. Seyasirt (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.