Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janaki Venkataraman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Materialscientist (talk) 07:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Janaki Venkataraman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a Notable Person KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 07:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As written, no notability outside being a First Lady, and that's not enough (notability cannot be inherited from their husband's notable post). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even considering deleting an article on the first lady of a major country shows a troubling lack of awareness of systemic bias. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Further checking, in
  HighBeam, shows plenty of RS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Keep Apparently no one did
WP:BEFORE as simply reading the sources already on the file show that she was an active first lady, playing host to world leaders throughout her husband's presidency. Prior to that, she was a "partner in the Labor Law Journal" her husband began as well as a human and animal rights activist. Her activism against harm of silkworms led to development of techniques to create silk without killing the silk worms. [1] SusunW (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep: Accomplishments in the public sphere as First Lady of India alone would qualify her, but in addition, her own accomplishments stand alone and establish independent notability. Clearly a systemic bias issue that this article is even up for AfD. Montanabw ^(talk) 03:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable deceased person. Good potential here for Good Article page. — Cirt (talk) 05:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notified as article creator. Clear keep as would be with any first lady of a major nation. Confusion over why this is even being contested. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 19:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.