Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Clark (ice hockey) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Clark (ice hockey)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was recently up for an AfD and was closed as keep because some editors thought playing in the inline Roller Hockey International league granted automatic notability. A discussion at

WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the nominator said I see no reason to suggest that playing in the RHI meets any NSPORT criteria. Further, even if it did when challenge a person is only presumed notable under . As there is not GNG evidence to support Clark being notable for any kind of hockey playing - coverage being insignificant, local, or otherwise unsatisfactory to meet the requirements of GNG - this article should be deleted. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC) In the interests of disclosure I participated in the linked discussion at WT:NSPORT and became aware of this AfD because of the notice placed there Barkeep49 (talk)[reply]
Delete: The subject fails the GNG, and there are no pertinent notability criteria granting him presumptive notability otherwise. Ravenswing 03:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Renomination note In case there are concerns this renomination was too soon, the previous AfD was closed by ST47 with the note: No prejudice against a second AfD being opened in the near future, if the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Notability_of_Roller_Hockey_International_players results in a relevant change to the guideline. Both that talk page discussion as well as the since-closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Clarke (ice hockey) ("Clarke" with an "e", also a roller hockey player) rejected the claim that a pro roller hockey player is presumed to be notable.—Bagumba (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet
WP:NHOCKEY also. Consensus at the similar Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Clarke (ice hockey) ("Clarke" with an "e") rejected that a professional athlete, regardless of their sport, was presumed to be notable. Only those mentioned explicitly under Wikipedia:Notability (sports) § Professional sports people shoud be presumed notable.—Bagumba (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails GNG, like other comments noted. KingofGangsters (talk) 02:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.