Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Fonville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 06:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Fonville

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has not encyclopedia importance. The Allmusic article is trivial. Fevrret (talk) 01:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes
WP:GNG In ictu oculi (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per In ictu oculi. I have added two new sources (or, to be more precise, "Further readings") which should bolster notability. Certainly both are less trivial than Allmusic.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 04:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, looks notable with these sources and further reading, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per
WP:MUSBIO as a notable representative of a significant playing technique. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.