Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

]

Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University

Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases. A Google search gives 62 hits, most of them issues of this journal in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet

WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator who posted justification on article's talk page. The arguments given rest on a misinterpretation of NJournals, so PROD reason still stands. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Comment: That article is itself also problematic, as it has no in-depth independent sources (I am ignoring several in-passing mentions added today by User4edits). The whole set of articles smells like a walled garden to me, with articles for all institutes/faculties, something we usually don't even do for much more notable universities than this one. --Randykitty (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Randykitty You can propose to merge them all to Banaras Hindu University, however, not the place to discuss that. User4edits (talk) 19:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: While I appreciate your efforts, I don't see anything that would make me change my mind. Some in-passing mentions or listings are not sufficient to establish notability. --Randykitty (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.