Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bentley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 08:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Bentley

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. No coverage to meet

WP:BIO. Article is based on primary sources. LibStar (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Bilateral relations, Malaysia, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: we have now got to the very odd point where more biographies of ambassadors are currently proposed for deletion than any other human activity. While an ambassador can be non-notable, as noted at Wikipedia:Introduction_to_deletion_process#Competence — articles, categories or templates should not be nominated in a routine fashion, nor because one feels too lazy to check for sources, or if the content is still being built or improved. The response to this should simply be to tag for better references. Moonraker (talk) 04:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where are the third party sources to establish notability? This is
WP:JUSTAVOTE. LibStar (talk) 08:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 18:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Moonraker. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PERX. Moonraker provided no sources to establish notability. LibStar (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Question: @NoonIcarus:, what sources, policies and guidelines are you basing your vote on? // Timothy :: talk 12:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP fails GNG and BIO. Source eval table:

Comments	Reference
Government annoucement, not IS RS with SIGCOV	1. "Diplomatic appointments". Government of Canada. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
Twitter accounts don't show notability	2. ^ "Julia G. Bentley on Twitter".
Primary	3. ^ "Message from the High Commissioner". High Commission of Canada in Malaysia. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
Alumni source, not IS RS with SIGCOV	4. ^ "TFS Alumni". alumni.tfs.ca. Retrieved 2021-02-13.

BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

The keep votes didn't supply sources or arguments based in policy and guidelines, so the only response is an offer of cheese for the whine.

BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (

WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 12:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.