Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasuba
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kasuba
- )
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Clarityfiend (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unnecessary article, and yet it creeps me out :(.Mitch32contribs 15:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. 94 15:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are plenty of equivalent slang terms for this in English. No need to have an article for a slang term in a language whuch by itself barely passes the test of notability. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 16:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Somewhat off-topic, but why not try actually reading Meitei_language and tell me whether you think, with all the scholarly papers there and the millions of speakers it has, it's "a language whuch by itself barely passes the test of notability" cab (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per ]
- Delete – At this point it is only a term in the ]
- A word's being English or not has nothing to do with whether it has gotten non-trivial coverage in reliable sources (in English, a language of the country it originates from, or a third language) or whether the concept it describes is encyclopedic or not. cab (talk) 19:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Please, Wikipedia is not a dictionary and not a place for NN slang terms. Harland1 (t/c) 18:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per ]
- Delete There is nothing interesting or encyclopedic about a foreign language slang that has no notability in english usage. JERRY talk contribs 02:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just a dictionary definition, and ]
- Delete. one would really want some notability for it to be here. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.