Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Crull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per the addition of reliable sources 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Crull

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:SIGCOV. John from Idegon (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have created a lot of bios, but journalism is outside of my wheelhouse. I was unaware that job announcements do not count as
WP:WAWARD) 04:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
- WP:ROUTINE is what you seek I think Tony. John from Idegon (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Keep I added more information and several more sources. She is a longtime sports commentator who regularly appears on television for commentary, and has worked for Fox Sports, NBC Sports Chicago and many others. Passes
WP:ENTERTAINER for "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" as she has appeared on sports television dozens if not hundreds of times since 2006. Lonehexagon (talk) 22:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Reporters are not entertainers. John from Idegon (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which guideline says a sports commentator is not an entertainer? According to Wikipedia, entertainers can be "Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities." I would say she is an opinion maker as she offers commentary. Regardless of how you define her position, I believe the article still passes

WP:GNG. Lonehexagon (talk) 01:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment I am ready and willing to award ten extra points to anyone who can use

WP:JOURNALIST.104.163.158.37 (talk) 05:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as the nom says, the references are largely job announcements. Far too little coverage to establish notability.104.163.158.37 (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after the additions by
WP:WAWARD) 00:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Passes GNG with the coverage and sources. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 17:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets
WP:GNG (barely) with coverage in multiple indy sources. I was swayed by this podcast which I added that was solely about her life and career experiences. Otherwise, was ready to !vote delete as article appeared to be case of Wikipedia:Masking the lack of notability, especially after I removed both unrelated and duplicate references. However, there is other significant coverage with "OKC Thunder hires KOCO's Kelly Crull to be sideline reporter". The Oklahoman and "Noblesville's Kelly Crull covers the story of a lifetime in Cubs World Series win" WISH TV. Generally, I'm not in favor of bios that could basically never be more than a list of employers.—Bagumba (talk) 11:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.