Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LFO scandal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LFO scandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Politics, Medicine, and Poland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. The nom did not bother do do
  WP:TROUT is in order. The article is underrefrenced, but the scandal was covered by Polish newspapers of note of that time. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - notable per refs in this article and the Polish version

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 15:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Don't forget BEFORE.C.3 and
  WP:ATD-T. Thanks to Piotrus for tagging it now. —siroχo 18:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.