Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latham Park

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2023 December 1.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 07:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Latham Park

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent RS on the page. Nothing to suggest that the stadium has much notability outside of Newtown_A.F.C. but possibly could be merged as an AtD JMWt (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Wales. JMWt (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per
WP:NBUILDING. (update) There are independent RS cites on the page. Including BBC and County Times. I feel this nomination is floored. Govvy (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Please explain more. It is not a habited place or a natural feature and isn’t a historical building of national important so I don’t see how that guideline applies JMWt (talk) 10:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Geoland and NBuilding encompass the aspect of being a geographical location and the physical building of the stadium. Yes you need sources to establish this and there are sources, the place has links to a historic figure of George Latham (footballer), which adds the historical aspect. You have a multi-use venue, so a redirect straight to the football club is a no. Upon a google search, there are loads of small news articles about the place. That all adds up, the two BBC sources in the article [1], [2] and with the other sources is more than enough for basic GNG. Your nomination is floored. Thank you. Govvy (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  For the record, I dispute this reading of the notability criteria. Passing and insignificant newspaper articles are not enough for the GNG or NBuilding. JMWt (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Newtown A.F.C. - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Govvy. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Govvy.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.