Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of crimes involving a silicone mask

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with no prejudice against merging into an article about silicone masks in general once one has been created. SoWhy 09:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of crimes involving a silicone mask

List of crimes involving a silicone mask (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overly specific list of non-notable examples as a collection of news events. What's next,

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 19:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's

list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 21:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Notable and relevant article. This AfD is tragic. The article was started yesterday. Prodded yesterday. And then AfD'd today.
  WP:ATD. Lightburst (talk) 21:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep While only two of the incidents have their own articles right now, the subject is quite notable. Ample news coverage around the world for some of these events, not just in the nations that they take place in. We wouldn't list all crimes involving a gun since that's something quite common. Using silicone masks is not. I was going to make an article about crimes involving silicone masks, and decided to just make it a list article since that's what it was shaping up to be. Dream Focus 22:26, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The topic passes
  WP:IMPERFECT, rather than deleting anything. Andrew D. (talk) 22:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. It would be preferable to have this list incorporated in a
  silicone mask article, as there aren't all that many entries, but a couple of the sources do discuss its use in crimes, so LISTN is satisfied. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to
  WP:BLP perspective. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• That target (
  silicone mask) is a redirect and as such is not about silicone masks or crime. Lightburst (talk) 01:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Yes. I used the link because it was used above. The merge would be to mask, which is perfectly relevant. I'd want to see a section on silicone masks develop there to the point it needs to be spun out before seeing a stand-alone article for that (but that's a discussion apart from this AfD, of course). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:24, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the best option would be to create a
  silicone mask page, which appears to not exist yet, and make this one element of the page.ParticipantObserver (talk) 15:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete. List of trivia,
  WP:NLIST. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I am not sure WP:OR applies to this list. The article creator made no attempt to
  WP:SOURCELIST, in that the entries must have the same importance to the subject as would be required for the entry to be included in the text of the article according to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. So the established criteria is "crimes involving a silicone mask" and the criteria for inclusion on the list is clearly met by each addition. Lightburst (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Weak Keep. In the absence of a silicone mask article to merge to, keep is the only viable option.4meter4 (talk) 04:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.