Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of loudspeaker manufacturers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Navou ^banter 13:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of loudspeaker manufacturers

List of loudspeaker manufacturers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Wikipedia is not a list of lists Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 14:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Agree as per Kungfuadam. —The preceding
  unsigned comment was added by RedHillian (talk • contribs
  ).
• Keep Nor is it a paper encyclopedia, if we have lists of companies by countries, manafacturers by industry why not this as well? --
  Librarianofages 22:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···

joe 02:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

• Weak Keep It is useful for reference. Loudspeakers article to big to include it. --155.144.251.120 03:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, a reasonable list, not indiscriminate, majority blue links. --Dhartung | Talk 05:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Dhartung. (I say that a lot.) -Toptomcat 13:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:LIST WilyD 14:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete Lots of things are useful but that doesn't mean we should include them. This article can never be more than a directory and original research. /Blaxthos 18:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • In fact, both of your rationals are pretty clearly false.
    reliable source that a company manufactures loudspeakers is so strange I'm not sure how to rebutt it, since I can't fathom how you arrive at it. WilyD 19:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Strong Keep Lots of things are "useless" (
  Pokemon, Power Rangers, Manga
  ......

) but we still have articles on them. Jcuk 21:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.