Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-awarded music artists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 20:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of most-awarded music artists

List of most-awarded music artists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was waiting for the work in progress tag to be removed. Now that it has, the first problem that I noticed is that there aren’t any references for the lead, hence the reason as to why this fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete or move to "multi-grammy award winning artists" I don't believe references are needed in a lead, but yes obviously the rest of what the nominator said is true. WP would be better served with an article similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_actors_with_two_or_more_Academy_Awards_in_acting_categories as there is some degree of arbitrariness to what awards contribute to this total. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 21:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Doesn't meet the right criteria based on
  WP:SYNTH to justify an article of its own, should be merged into the article mentioned above as opposed to being deleted. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 22:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete "The exact number of all awards received by an artist is difficult to verify because there is no organization regularly tracking the data." Your article is bad when your lede serves quite perfectly as its own deletion rationale. Nate • (chatter) 23:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not feasible to maintain when most (or all) of the claims are hard to confirm in the first place. This at best is a collection of WP:SYNTH and doesn't warrant an article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just another
  WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. The lists lead itself clearly indicates that. The exact number of all awards received by an artist is difficult to verify because there is no organization regularly tracking the data. Most media only report the most-awarded artists at individual award show, and a complete list of the most-awarded music artists remains unavailable. Nevertheless, the following list features music artists having won 10 times or more at five different award shows, thus giving an illustration of the “most-awarded music artists in history The articles of individual awards shows like Grammy, American Music Awards clearly mentioned who bagged most of their awards.— TheWikiholic (talk) 04:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete The list is arbitrary, not well-sourced castorbailey (talk) 05:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This list deserves a 10 for effort and creativity and a 0 for compliance with policies and guidelines. gidonb (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I think those above me have said most of what I'd want to. My biggest concern is probaably the arbitrary threshold of awards to include in said list. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment and delete With celebrity culture of all-about them, as far I remember, a handful of publications have elaborated lists regarding "most awarded" artists, or at least some have reported a "total" of award and nominations received by a specific artist. However, it feels like circular reporting. Bluesatellite gave a picture, but I also felt is not necessary. Aside that doesn't exist any tracking body, the concept of "award" is hard to determine: some people could mix solo/group careers of certain artists to present a "total", or imagine those awards gave to artist's team instead them, "certified awards" (VEVO, Guinness World Records), even listicles... and so on. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 01:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is a new article that can be improved with more sources. Articles such as "Taylor Swift makes history as most awarded artist of all time" in
  WP:TROUT the nomination as this appears to be a content dispute about Michael Jackson with discussion based at Talk:Michael_Jackson#“Most_awarded_musician_in_history”. The fact that Michael Jackson doesn't appear at the top of this page is irksome to MJ's fanbase, and instead of expanding the article to include more of MJ, they are trying to delete it. Binksternet (talk) 03:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  The above Entertainment Weekly show link that you provided was about Taylor Swift overtaking Michael Jackson as the most-winning American music awards artist. And it's already covered on the page of the American Music Awards. And Whintey Houston being the most-awarded female musical artist is yet to be verified and hence it has been removed from her pages as well. Reading the above talk page discussion gives the impression that the creator of this list has created it only to prove his arguments. TheWikiholic (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]