Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lofe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lofe

Lofe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a Youtuber or content creator that doesn't meet our

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, all primary and
  WP:USERG
  sources.

AmI 21:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes I am aware, fixing it now — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarklarkOxs (talk • contribs) 20:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - all the sources are social media. Nothing reliable, nothing independent. Fails
  WP:GNG.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   20:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  there are no sources apart from that, there are many wikipedia pages withought citing, they don't get deleted. The thing to do is tag the page to say it needs citing DarklarkOxs (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  "Needs citing"? Do you have any citing other than social media?? Citations101 (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I have searched the internet and nowhere else has information except unreliable sites and social media DarklarkOxs (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  There you go! That means it's too soon to be featured on Wikipedia. Citations101 (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Which means -- drum roll -- that the subject is not notable. Ravenswing 23:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  if there are pages without citations, please tag them so we can review or delete them as needed. Oaktree b (talk) 00:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. these alone don't belong to wikipedia! Citations101 (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the author's admission that the subject cannot be referenced other than to unreliable sites and social media.
  WP:NN. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I think the high subscriber count may be enough to save this from {{db-web}} speedy deletion, but that does not provide actual notability. That requires in-depth independent reliable sourcing, which we see none of in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The article's author said it best, there is no information from reliable sources. May be a case of
  WP:TOOSOON. ULPS (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. What a weird article. From the Google News search it seems that Lofe is very, very, very minimally notable for "pranking"
  WP:SIGCOV. Allen's article doesn't mention it and no other article links here at all. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - All sources are non-reliable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Utter failure of GNG, WP:V. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenswing (talk • contribs) **0
• Speedy Delete: This user has been blocked indefinitely for
  WP:NOTHERE. --ALSTROEMERIA🌸Čijukas Kuvajamas 00:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Delete: Correction, this user was created before being blocked indefinitely, G5 is not applicable, but the article does not comply with

  WP:GNG, so delete. ALSTROEMERIA🌸Čijukas Kuvajamas 01:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Strong Delete: Agreed with all editors involved. CastJared (talk) 08:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: non-notable, all sources are user-generated. No evidence of passing GNG. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 11:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete seems like an interesting fellow, no sources found for him in RS. Nothing at all really, some blog mentions it looks like. Oaktree b (talk) 00:34, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, I can't find any coverage in reliable sources. Merko (talk) 01:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only citations are to YouTube and Instagram. That's it. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow Delete. I agree with DanielRigal's findings - the only event I can find reliable sources covering them in relation to is the Ray Allen "prank", at best this is a
  WP:SNOW deletion here, as it is obvious that this is going to have no outcome other than deletion. 192.76.8.86 (talk) 17:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment: According to [1], DarklarkOxs[2] is suspected as the sock of Masterofroblox, and G5 may apply. --Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 10:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails
  WP:GNG -- Devokewater 15:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.