Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MARSEC-XL (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MARSEC-XL

MARSEC-XL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete GNews finds a bit of coverage from Matla about it, most recently in 2013. I think it doesn't warrant an article based on the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails
  WP:GNG. As noted in the first AFD, sources are largely promotional press releases that lack independence.4meter4 (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 00:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.