Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark McCoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark McCoy

Non-notable election candidate. Contested prod. MER-C 10:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails
  WP:BIO for politicians. 26 ghits. Mitaphane _talk 11:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. If he wins, he gets an article, but until then the only media attention he has seems to be by the Libertarian party themselves, so he fails
  WP:BIO --Mnemeson 16:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as
  reliable sources. If such sources existed, the fact that this article reads like an advertisement would not be ground for deletion, but rather for appropriate tags or rewriting to conform to said sources. Notability should not be used as a ground for deletion when adequate, independent grounds exist that are based entirely on Wikipedia policy. · j e r s y k o talk · 17:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per all above.UberCryxic 19:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if he wins the election, he might be notable enough for an article, but until then, adios. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 20:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. RickReinckens 23:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:BIO and Google. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 23:41, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Fails On October 19th, 2006 a
  unsigned comment was added by Shellin (talk • contribs
  ) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.