Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Uhatahi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 02:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Uhatahi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources [1] and [2] about his coaching activities should be sufficient. EternalNomad (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG. Simione001 (talk) 01:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No it doesn't Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as per @EternalNomad:. Also, he is Tonga national teams third highest international scorer of all time. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails
WP:SIGCOV. Neither source mentioned above goes into the subject in any detail and thus do not count as significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk
) 18:19, 26 June 2022

Delete fails GNG. The sources mentioned (and a few others I found) mention Uhatani tangentially, not significantly as needed to demonstrate notability. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 22:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the sources above are classic examples of passing mentions which do not add up to a passing of
WP:GNG. In my searches, I was unable to find any evidence of extensive, detailed coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Fails
WP:NSPORT as the sources do not address the subject "directly and in detail" as required in our guidelines.4meter4 (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.