Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko John Albrecht

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marko John Albrecht

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Poorly sourced

primary sources that cannot assist notability at all, and media coverage which glancingly namechecks his existence -- the closest any source here comes to being about him in any substantive way is a piece in the real estate section of The New York Times about how his Finnish heritage inspired him to buy a house with a sauna in it. But having a sauna in your house is not a reason why you get an encyclopedia article in and of itself, and nothing that would constitute a claim of notability here is sourced properly. Bearcat (talk) 23:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete We have sources like a New Jersey newspaper that mentions he showed up to see the Stanley Cup on display somewhere, but in a way that indicates that he is no more notable than anyone else in the crowd. The New York Times article is a broad article on incorporating cultural heritage into housing, and not about him at all. Then we have an article from the community college he attended, praising his accomplishments in filmmaking. At least there we have a substantive discussion of his work, but it comes from a source that is using the whole thing to try to attack students, and thus a clearly biased source. Nothing indicates Albrecht is anywhere near being notable as a filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:PROMO; a weakly sourced vanity page. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.