Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music India (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Media Worldwide Limited. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Music India

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the links provided as reference show nothing. Moreover, no independent and reliable source found for the subject. Dial911 (talk) 04:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just fixed both of the citations in the article. They both show content, and one is an independent reliable source.
WP:BROADCAST states "most television stations that produce original content should be presumed notable for Wikipedia purposes." The question is, does this station produce original content? Music videos are original content, but generally not produced by the broadcaster. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete -- does not meet
WP:BROADCAST as it does not broadcast original content. Significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
As a counterexample, MTV likely would have been considered notable back in the days when it was broadcasting only music videos. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this was one of the first channels to show music videos 24 hours in India. I acknowledge that it is a bit hard to find sources, but I clearly remember watching Music India (along with another channel called B4U Music) for music videos. At that time, India only had MTV and later VH1. These channels enjoyed a lot of viewership because India did not have widespread broadband connectivity at that time.--DreamLinker (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I will look for sources try to improve the article. Please relist this once as I don't want it to be deleted hastily. In the worst case that it has to be deleted, I would request a merge to Media Worldwide Limited.--DreamLinker (talk) 01:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~as a channel that once broadcast for international audience it does meet
WP:BCAST.–Ammarpad (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Changed to Merge to
WP:BCAST as 24 popular Indian music channel, I can't get any reference to support standalone page. Only their updated media schedule can be found in indiatimes.com. Plus the parent page is stub too, better develop one meaningful page –Ammarpad (talk) 02:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: On request, giving time for additional sources to be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 08:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly merge to Media Worldwide Limited. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.